GAS: Enhancing Reward-Cost Balance of Generative Model-assisted Offline Safe RL
Zifan LIU, Xinran Li, Shibo Chen, Jun Zhang
摘要
Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning (OSRL) aims to learn a policy that achieves high performance in sequential decision-making while satisfying safety constraints, using only pre-collected datasets. Recent works, inspired by the strong capabilities of Generative Models (GMs), reformulate decision-making in OSRL as a conditional generative process, where GMs generate desirable actions conditioned on predefined reward and cost return-to-go values. However, GM-assisted methods face two major challenges in constrained settings: (1) they lack the ability to ``stitch'' optimal transitions from suboptimal trajectories within the dataset, and (2) they struggle to balance reward maximization with constraint satisfaction, particularly when tested with imbalanced human-specified reward-cost conditions. To address these issues, we propose Goal-Assisted Stitching (GAS), a novel algorithm designed to enhance stitching capabilities while effectively balancing reward maximization and constraint satisfaction. To enhance the stitching ability, GAS first augments and relabels the dataset at the transition level, enabling the construction of high-quality trajectories from suboptimal ones. GAS also introduces novel goal functions, which estimate the optimal achievable reward and cost goals from the dataset. These goal functions, trained using expectile regression on the relabeled and augmented dataset, allow GAS to accommodate a broader range of reward-cost return pairs and achieve a better tradeoff between reward maximization and constraint satisfaction compared to human-specified values. The estimated goals then guide policy training, ensuring robust performance under constrained settings. Furthermore, to improve training stability and efficiency, we reshape the dataset to achieve a more uniform reward-cost return distribution. Empirical results validate the effectiveness of GAS, demonstrating superior performance in balancing reward maximization and constraint satisfaction compared to existing methods.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper25
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 2,881 次
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 2,557 次
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 被引用 1,402 次
- Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian MethodsAdam Stooke, Joshua Achiam, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 被引用 403 次
- Delving into Deep Imbalanced RegressionYuzhe Yang, Kaiwen Zha, Ying-Cong Chen, Hao Wang 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 385 次
相关 Paper
- Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Trajectory ClassificationZe Gong, Akshat Kumar, Pradeep VarakanthamAAAI 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- Constraint-Adaptive Policy Switching for Offline Safe Reinforcement LearningYassine Chemingui, Aryan Deshwal, Honghao Wei, Alan Fern 等AAAI 2025 · 被引用 12 次
- Online Optimization for Offline Safe Reinforcement LearningYassine Chemingui, Aryan Deshwal, Alan Fern, Thanh Nguyen-Tang 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- Latent Safety-Constrained Policy Approach for Safe Offline Reinforcement LearningPrajwal Koirala, Zhanhong Jiang, Soumik Sarkar, Cody H. FlemingICLR 2025
- Constraint-Conditioned Actor-Critic for Offline Safe Reinforcement LearningZijian Guo, Weichao Zhou, Shengao Wang, Wenchao LiICLR 2025
