Hard Examples for Common Variable Decision Heuristics
Marc Vinyals
摘要
The CDCL algorithm for SAT is equivalent to the resolution proof system under a few assumptions, one of them being an optimal non-deterministic procedure for choosing the next variable to branch on. In practice this task is left to a variable decision heuristic, and since the so-called VSIDS decision heuristic is considered an integral part of CDCL, whether CDCL with a VSIDS-like heuristic is also equivalent to resolution remained a significant open question. We give a negative answer by building a family of formulas that have resolution proofs of polynomial size but require exponential time to decide in CDCL with common heuristics such as VMTF, CHB, and certain implementations of VSIDS and LRB.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它相关 Paper
- Guiding CDCL SAT Search via Random Exploration amid Conflict DepressionMd. Solimul Chowdhury, Martin Müller, Jia-Huai YouAAAI 2020 · 被引用 5 次
- Hardness of Random Reordered Encodings of Parity for Resolution and CDCLLeroy Chew, Alexis de Colnet, Friedrich Slivovsky, Stefan SzeiderAAAI 2024 · 被引用 3 次
- X-SAT: An Efficient Circuit-Based SAT SolverYuhang Qian, Zhihan Chen, Xindi Zhang, Shaowei CaiDAC 2025 · 被引用 4 次
- Deeply Optimizing the SAT Solver for the IC3 AlgorithmYuheng Su, Qiusong Yang, Yiwei Ci, Yingcheng Li 等CAV 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- ppSAT: Towards Two-Party Private SAT SolvingNing Luo, Samuel Judson, Timos Antonopoulos, Ruzica Piskac 等USENIX Security 2022
