AutoRAN: Automated Hijacking of Safety Reasoning in Large Reasoning Models
Jiacheng Liang, Tanqiu Jiang, Yuhui Wang, Rongyi Zhu, Fenglong Ma, Ting Wang
摘要
This paper presents AutoRAN 1 , the first framework to automate the hijacking of internal safety reasoning in large reasoning models (LRMs). At its core, AutoRAN pioneers an execution simulation paradigm that leverages a weaker but less-aligned model to simulate execution reasoning for initial hijacking attempts and iteratively refine attacks by exploiting reasoning patterns leaked through the target LRM's refusals. This approach steers the target model to bypass its own safety guardrails and elaborate on harmful instructions. We evaluate AutoRAN against state-of-the-art LRMs, including gpt-o3/o4-mini and Gemini-2.5-Flash, across multiple benchmarks (AdvBench, Harm-Bench, and StrongReject). Results show that AutoRAN achieves approaching 100% success rate within one or a few turns, effectively neutralizing reasoning-based defenses even when evaluated by robustly aligned external models. This work reveals that the transparency of the reasoning process itself creates a critical and exploitable attack surface, highlighting the urgent need for new defenses that protect models' reasoning traces rather than merely their final outputs. The code for replicating Au-toRAN is available at: https://github.com/ JACKPURCELL/AutoRAN-public .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- Reasoning as an Adaptive Defense for SafetyTaeyoun Kim, Fahim Tajwar, Aditi Raghunathan, Aviral KumarNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 24 次
- Rethinking Jailbreak Detection of Large Vision Language Models with Representational Contrastive ScoringPeichun Hua, Hao Li, Shanghao Shi, Zhiyuan Yu 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 8 次
- ReasoningGuard: Safeguarding Large Reasoning Models with Inference-time Safety Aha MomentsYuquan Wang, Mi Zhang, Yining Wang, Geng Hong 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Reasoning as an Attack Surface: Adaptive Evolutionary CoT Jailbreaks for LLMsJianan Li, Simeng Qin, Jiapeng Chen, Lionel Z. Wang 等ICML 2026
- Less Diverse, Less Safe: The Indirect But Pervasive Risk of Test-Time Scaling in Large Language ModelsShahriar Kabir Nahin, Hadi Askari, Muhao Chen, Anshuman ChhabraICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,068 次
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 2,230 次
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 1,031 次
- AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language ModelsXiaogeng Liu, Nan Xu, Muhao Chen, Chaowei XiaoICLR 2024 · 被引用 722 次
相关 Paper
- ARMOR: Aligning Secure and Safe Large Language Models via Meticulous ReasoningZhengyue Zhao, Yingzi Ma, Somesh Jha, Marco Pavone 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 8 次
- AdvChain: Adversarial Chain-of-Thought Tuning for Robust Safety Alignment of Large Reasoning ModelsZihao Zhu, Xinyu Wu, Gehan Hu, Siwei Lyu 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 6 次
- More Thinking, Less Talking: Internalizing Deliberative Safety into LLM ParametersGuan Wang, Xuehai Tang, Biyu Zhou, Jizhong Han 等ACL 2026
- SAFEPATH: Preventing Harmful Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought via Early AlignmentWonje Jeung, Sangyeon Yoon, Minsuk Kahng, Albert NoNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 31 次
- Reasoning-to-Defend: Safety-Aware Reasoning Can Defend Large Language Models from JailbreakingJunda Zhu, Lingyong Yan, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 2 次
