Data-IQ: Characterizing subgroups with heterogeneous outcomes in tabular data
Nabeel Seedat, Jonathan Crabbé, Ioana Bica, Mihaela van der Schaar
摘要
High model performance, on average, can hide that models may systematically underperform on subgroups of the data. We consider the tabular setting, which surfaces the unique issue of outcome heterogeneity -this is prevalent in areas such as healthcare, where patients with similar features can have different outcomes, thus making reliable predictions challenging. To tackle this, we propose Data-IQ, a framework to systematically stratify examples into subgroups with respect to their outcomes. We do this by analyzing the behavior of individual examples during training, based on their predictive confidence and, importantly, the aleatoric (data) uncertainty. Capturing the aleatoric uncertainty permits a principled characterization and then subsequent stratification of data examples into three distinct subgroups (Easy, Ambiguous, Hard). We experimentally demonstrate the benefits of Data-IQ on four real-world medical datasets. We show that Data-IQ's characterization of examples is most robust to variation across similarly performant (yet different) models, compared to baselines. Since Data-IQ can be used with any ML model (including neural networks, gradient boosting etc.), this property ensures consistency of data characterization, while allowing flexible model selection. Taking this a step further, we demonstrate that the subgroups enable us to construct new approaches to both feature acquisition and dataset selection. Furthermore, we highlight how the subgroups can inform reliable model usage, noting the significant impact of the Ambiguous subgroup on model generalization. 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022).
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper6
- Curated LLM: Synergy of LLMs and Data Curation for tabular augmentation in low-data regimesNabeel Seedat, Nicolas Huynh, Boris van Breugel, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2024 · 被引用 61 次
- Can You Rely on Your Model Evaluation? Improving Model Evaluation with Synthetic Test DataBoris van Breugel, Nabeel Seedat, Fergus Imrie, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 51 次
- Dissecting Sample Hardness: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Hardness Characterization Methods for Data-Centric AINabeel Seedat, Fergus Imrie, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2024 · 被引用 16 次
- TRIAGE: Characterizing and auditing training data for improved regressionNabeel Seedat, Jonathan Crabbé, Zhaozhi Qian, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 8 次
- Breaking the Barrier of Hard Samples: A Data-Centric Approach to Synthetic Data for Medical TasksMaynara Donato de Souza, Cleber ZanchettinICML 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper11
- Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in TrainingMansheej Paul, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina DziugaiteNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 806 次
- "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AINithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong 等CHI 2021 · 被引用 725 次
- Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationEvan Zheran Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S. Chen, Aditi Raghunathan 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 683 次
- Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin RankingGeoff Pleiss, Tianyi Zhang, Ethan R. Elenberg, Kilian Q. WeinbergerNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 398 次
- VIME: Extending the Success of Self- and Semi-supervised Learning to Tabular DomainJinsung Yoon, Yao Zhang, James Jordon, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 370 次
相关 Paper
- Data-Driven Subgroup Identification for Linear RegressionZachary Izzo, Ruishan Liu, James ZouICML 2023 · 被引用 7 次
- Robust Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Uncertainty QuantificationHyun-Suk Lee, Yao Zhang, William R. Zame, Cong Shen 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 21 次
- Unveiling the Role of Data Uncertainty in Tabular Deep LearningNikolay Kartashev, Ivan Rubachev, Artem BabenkoICML 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Data-SUITE: Data-centric identification of in-distribution incongruous examplesNabeel Seedat, Jonathan Crabbé, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2022 · 被引用 16 次
- Improving Subgroup Robustness via Data SelectionSaachi Jain, Kimia Hamidieh, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Ilyas 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 17 次
