Educators, Solicitors, Flamers, Motivators, Sympathizers: Characterizing Roles in Online Extremist Movements
Shruti Phadke, Tanushree Mitra
摘要
Social media provides the means by which extremist social movements, such as white supremacy and anti-LGBTQ, thrive online. Yet, we know little about the roles played by the participants of such movements. In this paper, we investigate these participants to characterize their roles, their role dynamics, and their influence in spreading online extremism. Our participants-online extremists accounts-are 4,876 public Facebook pages or groups that have shared information from the websites of 289 Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) designated extremist groups. Guided by theories of participatory activism, we map the information sharing features of these extremists accounts. By clustering the quantitative features followed by qualitative expert validation, we identify five roles surrounding extremist activism-educators, solicitors, flamers, motivators, sympathizers. For example, solicitors use links from extremist websites to attract donations and participation in extremist issues, whereas flamers share inflammatory extremist content inciting anger. We further investigate role dynamics such as, how stable these roles are over time and how likely will extremist accounts transition from one role into another. We find that roles core to the movement-educators and solicitors-are more stable, while flamers and motivators can transition to sympathizers with high probability. Finally, using a Hawkes process model, we test which roles are more influential in spreading various types of information. We find that educators and solicitors exert the most influence in triggering extremist link posts, whereas flamers are influential in triggering the spread of information from fake news sources. Our results help in situating various roles on the trajectory of deeper engagement into the extremist movements and understanding the potential effect of various counter-extremism interventions. Our findings have implications for understanding how online extremist movements flourish through participatory activism and how they gain a spectrum of allies for mobilizing extremism online.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- The Effect of Individual Traits on Emerging Roles in Synchronous Computer-Mediated GroupsVishal B. Vatnani, Jordan B. BarlowCSCW 2024 · 被引用 2 次
- Social Catalysts: Characterizing People Who Spark Conversations Among OthersMartin Saveski, Farshad Kooti, Sylvia Morelli Vitousek, Carlos Diuk 等CSCW 2021 · 被引用 7 次
- Rewarding Engagement and Personalization in Popularity-Based Rankings Amplifies Extremism and PolarizationJacopo D'Ignazi, Emma Fraxanet, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, Gaël Le Mens 等KDD 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Mobilizing Manufactured Reality: How Participatory Disinformation Shaped Deep Stories to Catalyze Action during the 2020 U.S. Presidential ElectionStephen Prochaska, Kayla Duskin, Zarine Kharazian, Carly Minow 等CSCW 2023 · 被引用 48 次
- Do Platform Migrations Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/IncelsManoel Horta Ribeiro, Shagun Jhaver, Savvas Zannettou, Jeremy Blackburn 等CSCW 2021 · 被引用 102 次
