Scalable Equivalence Checking and Verification of Shallow Quantum Circuits
Nengkun Yu, Xuan Du Trinh, Thomas Reps
摘要
This paper concerns the problem of checking if two shallow (i.e., constant-depth) quantum circuits perform equivalent computations. Equivalence checking is a fundamental correctness question—needed, e.g., for ensuring that transformations applied to a quantum circuit do not alter its behavior. For quantum circuits, the problem is challenging because a straightforward representation on a classical computer of each circuit’s quantum state can require time and space that are exponential in the number of qubits n . The paper presents Projection-Based Equivalence Checking (PBEC), which provides decision procedures for two variants of the equivalence-checking problem. Both can be carried out on a classical computer in time and space that, for any fixed depth, is linear in n . Our key insight is that local projections can serve as constraints that fully characterize the output state of a shallow quantum circuit. The output state is the unique quantum state that satisfies all the constraints. Beyond equivalence checking, we show how to use the constraint representation to check a class of assertions, both statically and at run time. Our assertion-checking methods are sound and complete for assertions expressed as conjunctions of local projections. Our experiments showed that computing the constraint representation of a random 100-qubit 1D circuit of depth 6 takes 129.64 seconds. Equivalence checking between two random 100-qubit 1D circuits of depth 3 requires 4.46 seconds for fixed input | 0 〉 ⊗ 100 , and no more than 31.96 seconds for arbitrary inputs. Computing the constraint description for a random 100-qubit circuit of depth 3 takes 6.99 seconds for a 2D structure, compared to 10.67 seconds for a circuit with arbitrary connectivity. At depth 2, equivalence checking takes 0.20 seconds for fixed input and 0.44 seconds for arbitrary input, with similar performance for both 2D and arbitrary-connectivity circuits.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper15
- Silq: a high-level quantum language with safe uncomputation and intuitive semanticsBenjamin Bichsel, Maximilian Baader, Timon Gehr, Martin T. VechevPLDI 2020 · 被引用 145 次
- Projection-based runtime assertions for testing and debugging Quantum programsGushu Li, Li Zhou, Nengkun Yu, Yufei Ding 等OOPSLA 2020 · 被引用 120 次
- A verified optimizer for Quantum circuitsKesha Hietala, Robert Rand, Shih-Han Hung, Xiaodi Wu 等POPL 2021 · 被引用 111 次
- Quantum abstract interpretationNengkun Yu, Jens PalsbergPLDI 2021 · 被引用 69 次
- Quartz: superoptimization of Quantum circuitsMingkuan Xu, Zikun Li, Oded Padon, Sina Lin 等PLDI 2022 · 被引用 57 次
相关 Paper
- Equivalence checking paradigms in quantum circuit design: a case studyTom Peham, Lukas Burgholzer, Robert WilleDAC 2022 · 被引用 16 次
- Quantum Depth in the Random Oracle ModelAtul Singh Arora, Andrea Coladangelo, Matthew Coudron, Alexandru Gheorghiu 等STOC 2023 · 被引用 11 次
- The Power of Simulation for Equivalence Checking in Quantum ComputingLukas Burgholzer, Robert WilleDAC 2020 · 被引用 25 次
- Learning Shallow Quantum CircuitsHsin-Yuan Huang, Yunchao Liu, Michael Broughton, Isaac Kim 等STOC 2024 · 被引用 21 次
- Classical Simulation of Peaked Shallow Quantum CircuitsSergey Bravyi, David Gosset, Yinchen LiuSTOC 2024 · 被引用 4 次
