Convex Efficient Coding
Will Dorrell, Peter E. Latham, James C. R. Whittington
摘要
Why do neurons encode information the way they do? Normative answers to this question model neural activity as the solution to an optimisation problem; for example, the celebrated efficient coding hypothesis frames neural activity as the optimal encoding of information under efficiency constraints. Successful normative theories have varied dramatically in complexity, from simple linear models (Atick & Redlich, 1990), to complex deep neural networks (Lindsay, 2021). What complex models gain in flexibility, they lose in tractability and often understandability. Here, we split the difference by constructing a set of tractable but flexible normative representational theories. Instead of optimising the neural activities directly, following (Sengupta et al. 2018), we instead optimise the representational similarity, a matrix formed from the dot products of each pair of neural responses. Using this, we show that a large family of interesting optimisation problems are convex. This includes problems corresponding to linear and some non-linear neural networks, and problems from the literature not previously recognised as convex such as modified versions of semi-nonnegative matrix factorisation or nonnegative sparse coding. We put these findings to work in two ways. First, we extend previous results on modularity and mixed selectivity in neural activity; in so doing we provide the first necessary and sufficient identifiability result for a form of semi-nonnegative matrix factorisations. Second, we seek to understand the meaningfulness of single neural tuning curves as compared to neural representations. In particular we derive an identifiability result stating that, for an optimal representational similarity matrix, if neural tunings are `different enough' then they are uniquely linked to the optimal representational similarity, partially justifying the use of single neuron tuning analysis in neuroscience. In sum, we identify an interesting space of convex problems, and use that to derive neural coding results.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper11
- Neural Networks are Convex Regularizers: Exact Polynomial-time Convex Optimization Formulations for Two-layer NetworksMert Pilanci, Tolga ErgenICML 2020 · 被引用 142 次
- Revealing the Structure of Deep Neural Networks via Convex DualityTolga Ergen, Mert PilanciICML 2021 · 被引用 77 次
- Exact learning dynamics of deep linear networks with prior knowledgeLukas Braun, Clémentine C. J. Dominé, James Fitzgerald, Andrew M. SaxeNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 75 次
- Disentanglement via Latent QuantizationKyle Hsu, William Dorrell, James C. R. Whittington, Jiajun Wu 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 54 次
- Vector-output ReLU Neural Network Problems are Copositive Programs: Convex Analysis of Two Layer Networks and Polynomial-time AlgorithmsArda Sahiner, Tolga Ergen, John M. Pauly, Mert PilanciICLR 2021 · 被引用 45 次
相关 Paper
- Range, not Independence, Drives Modularity in Biologically Inspired RepresentationsWill Dorrell, Kyle Hsu, Luke Hollingsworth, Jin Hwa Lee 等ICLR 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Shaping the distribution of neural responses with interneurons in a recurrent circuit modelDavid Lipshutz, Eero P. SimoncelliNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 1 次
- Disentanglement with Biological Constraints: A Theory of Functional Cell TypesJames C. R. Whittington, Will Dorrell, Surya Ganguli, Timothy BehrensICLR 2023 · 被引用 13 次
- SIMPL: Scalable and hassle-free optimisation of neural representations from behaviourTom M. George, Pierre Glaser, Kim Stachenfeld, Caswell Barry 等ICLR 2025
- Compact task representations as a normative model for higher-order brain activitySeverin Berger, Christian K. MachensNeurIPS 2020
