STEM: Scaling Transformers with Embedding Modules
Ranajoy Sadhukhan, Sheng Cao, Harry Dong, Changsheng Zhao, Attiano Purpura-Pontoniere, Yuandong Tian, Zechun Liu, Beidi Chen
摘要
Fine-grained sparsity promises higher parametric capacity without proportional per-token compute, but often suffers from training instability, load balancing, and communication overhead. We introduce STEM (Scaling Transformers with Embedding Modules), a static, token-indexed approach that replaces the FFN up-projection with a layer-local embedding lookup while keeping the gate and down-projection dense. This removes runtime routing, enables CPU offload with asynchronous prefetch, and decouples capacity from both per-token FLOPs and cross-device communication. Empirically, STEM trains stably despite extreme sparsity. It improves downstream performance over dense baselines while reducing per-token FLOPs and parameter accesses (eliminating roughly one-third of FFN parameters). STEM learns embedding spaces with large angular spread which enhances its knowledge storage capacity. More interestingly, this enhanced knowledge capacity comes with better interpretability. The tokenindexed nature of STEM embeddings allows simple ways to perform knowledge editing and knowledge injection in an interpretable manner without any intervention in the input text or additional computation. In addition, STEM strengthens long-context performance: as sequence length grows, more distinct parameters are activated, yielding practical test-time capacity scaling. Across 350M and 1B model scales, STEM delivers up to ∼3-4% accuracy improvements overall, with notable gains on knowledge and reasoning-heavy benchmarks (ARC-Challenge, OpenBookQA, GSM8K, MMLU). Overall, STEM is an effective way of scaling parametric memory while providing better interpretability , better training stability and improved efficiency .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Conditional Memory via Scalable Lookup: A New Axis of Sparsity for Large Language ModelsXin Cheng, Wangding Zeng, Damai Dai, Qinyu Chen 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 57 次
- When Data Is Scarce: Scaling Sparse Language Models with Repeated TrainingBoqian Wu, Qiao Xiao, Patrik Okanovic, Tomasz Sternal 等ICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper20
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 3,415 次
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 被引用 3,037 次
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao 等AAAI 2020 · 被引用 2,916 次
- GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic ShardingDmitry Lepikhin, HyoukJoong Lee, Yuanzhong Xu, Dehao Chen 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 1,954 次
相关 Paper
- : Large Lookup LayersAlbert Tseng, Chris De SaICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Stem: Rethinking Causal Information Flow in Sparse AttentionLin Niu, Xin Luo, LinchuanXie, Yifu Sun 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Inner-layer Token Self-modulation as Another Scaling Axis for LLMsYebin Yang, Huaijin Wu, Jingtao Han, Yu Wang 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Sparse is Enough in Scaling TransformersSebastian Jaszczur, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Afroz Mohiuddin, Lukasz Kaiser 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 127 次
- Pretraining with hierarchical memories: separating long-tail and common knowledgeHadi Pouransari, David Grangier, C Thomas, Michael Kirchhof 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 11 次
