Quantitative Runtime Monitoring of Ethereum Transaction Attacks
Xinyao Xu, Ziyu Mao, Jianzhong Su, Xingwei Lin, David A. Basin, Jun Sun, Jingyi Wang
摘要
The rapid growth of decentralized applications, while revolutionizing financial transactions, has created an attractive target for malicious attacks. Existing approaches to detecting attacks often rely on predefined rules or simplistic and overly-specialized models, which lack the flexibility to handle the wide spectrum of diverse and dynamically changing attack types. To address this challenge, we present a general and extensible framework, MoE (Monitoring Ethereum), that leverages runtime verification to detect a wide range of attacks on Ethereum. MoE features an expressive attack modeling language, based on Metric First-order Temporal Logic (MFOTL), that can formalize a wide range of attacks. We integrate a novel semantic lifting approach that extracts system behaviors relevant for various attacks, which can be analyzed using the monitoring tool MonPoly. Furthermore, we also equip MoE with quantitative capabilities to evaluate the similarity between a transaction and an attack formula to enhance its performance in identifying attacks, including near-miss attacks. We carry out extensive experiments with MoE on a labeled benchmark and a large-scale dataset containing over one million transactions. On the labeled benchmark, MoE successfully detects 92.0% attacks and achieves a 45.0% higher recall rate than competing state-of-the-art tool. MoE finds 3,319 attacks with 95.4% precision on the large dataset. Furthermore, MoE uses quantitative analysis to uncover 8% additional attacks. Finally, the average time for monitoring a transaction is less than 23 ms, positioning MoE as a promising practical solution for real-time attack detection for Ethereum.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralized Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus InstabilityPhilip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 607 次
- Quantifying Blockchain Extractable Value: How dark is the forest?Kaihua Qin, Liyi Zhou, Arthur GervaisS&P 2022 · 被引用 336 次
- High-Frequency Trading on Decentralized On-Chain ExchangesLiyi Zhou, Kaihua Qin, Christof Ferreira Torres, Duc Viet Le 等S&P 2021 · 被引用 243 次
- Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Vulnerable Does Not Imply ExploitedDaniel Perez, Benjamin LivshitsUSENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 150 次
- Evil Under the Sun: Understanding and Discovering Attacks on Ethereum Decentralized ApplicationsLiya Su, Xinyue Shen, Xiangyu Du, Xiaojing Liao 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 74 次
相关 Paper
- Mind the Gap: Detecting Description-Execution Mismatch Attacks in DAO GovernanceBowen Cai, Nanzi Yang, Weiheng Bai, Youshui Lu 等CCS 2026
- Enhancing Smart Contract Security Analysis with Execution Property GraphsKaihua Qin, Zhe Ye, Zhun Wang, Weilin Li 等ISSTA 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Phishing in Wonderland: Evaluating Learning-Based Ethereum Phishing Transaction Detection and PitfallsAhod Alghuried, David MohaisenNDSS 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 被引用 298 次
- FORAY: Towards Effective Attack Synthesis against Deep Logical Vulnerabilities in DeFi ProtocolsHongbo Wen, Hanzhi Liu, Jiaxin Song, Yanju Chen 等CCS 2024 · 被引用 6 次
