Uncloneable Quantum States Are Necessary as Proofs and Advice
Rohit Chatterjee, Srijita Kundu, Supartha Podder
摘要
Uncloneability is one of the most remarkable properties of quantum states that separates them from classical information. Over the years, this property has found numerous uses in cryptography — many tasks that are classically impossible become possible in quantum cryptography due to uncloneability. In this work, we examine the utility of uncloneable quantum states in complexity theory, specifically in the form of proofs and advice. We define and study languages that necessarily need uncloneable quantum proofs and advice. Specifically, we define strictly uncloneable versions of the classes QMA, BQP/qpoly and FEQP/qpoly (which is the class of relational problems solvable exactly with polynomial-sized quantum advice). Strictly uncloneable QMA is defined to be the class of languages in QMA that only have uncloneable proofs, i.e., given any family of candidate proof states, a polynomial-time cloning algorithm cannot act on it to produce states that are jointly usable by k separate polynomial-time verifiers, for arbitrary polynomial k. This is a stronger notion of uncloneable proofs and advice than those considered in previous works, which only required the existence of a single family of proof or advice states that are uncloneable. We show that in the quantum oracle model, there exist languages in strictly uncloneable QMA and strictly uncloneable BQP/qpoly. The language in strictly uncloneable QMA also gives a quantum oracle separation between QMA and the class cloneableQMA introduced by Nehoran and Zhandry (2024). We also show without using any oracles that the language, used by Aaronson, Buhrman and Kretschmer (2024) to separate FEQP/qpoly and FBQP/poly, is in strictly uncloneable FEQP/qpoly.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
相关 Paper
- Public-Key Quantum Fire and Key-Fire From Classical OraclesAlper Çakan, Vipul Goyal, Omri ShmueliCRYPTO 2026
- On the Feasibility of Unclonable Encryption, and MorePrabhanjan Ananth, Fatih Kaleoglu, Xingjian Li, Qipeng Liu 等CRYPTO 2022 · 被引用 28 次
- Separate Your Domains: NIST PQC KEMs, Oracle Cloning and Read-Only IndifferentiabilityMihir Bellare, Hannah Davis, Felix GüntherEUROCRYPT 2020 · 被引用 35 次
- Classical Proofs of Quantum KnowledgeThomas Vidick, Tina ZhangEUROCRYPT 2021 · 被引用 19 次
- How to Use Quantum Indistinguishability ObfuscationAndrea Coladangelo, Sam GunnSTOC 2024 · 被引用 8 次
