Constant Latency and Finality for Dynamically Available DAG
Hans Schmiedel, Runchao Han, Qiang Tang, Ron Steinfeld, Jiangshan Yu
摘要
Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) based protocols have shown great promise to improve the performance of blockchains. The CAP theorem shows that it is impossible to have a single system that achieves both liveness (known as dynamic availability) and safety under network partition. This paper explores two types of DAG-based protocols prioritizing liveness or safety, named structured dissemination and Graded Common Prefix (GCP), respectively. For the former, we introduce the first DAG-based protocol with constant expected latency, providing high throughput dynamic availability under the sleepy model. Its expected latency is 3Δ and its throughput linearly scales with participation. We validate these expected performance improvements over existing constant latency sleepy model BFT by running prototypes of each protocol across multiple machines. The latter, GCP, is a primitive that provides safety under network partition, while being weaker than standard consensus. As a result, we are able to obtain a construction that runs in only 2 communication steps, as opposed to the 4 steps of existing low latency partially synchronous BFT. In addition, GCP can easily avoid relying on single leaders' proposals, becoming more resilient to crashes. We also validate these theoretical benefits of GCP experimentally. We leverage our findings to extend the Ebb-and-Flow framework, where two BFT sub-protocols allow different types of clients in the same system to prioritize either liveness or safety. Our extension integrates our two types of DAG-based protocols. This provides a hybrid DAG-based protocol with high throughput, dynamical availability, and finality under network partitions, without running a standard consensus protocol twice as required in existing work.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper10
- The Honey Badger of BFT ProtocolsAndrew Miller, Yu Xia, Kyle Croman, Elaine Shi 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 974 次
- Ouroboros Genesis: Composable Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Dynamic AvailabilityChristian Badertscher, Peter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 306 次
- Narwhal and Tusk: a DAG-based mempool and efficient BFT consensusGeorge Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Alexander SpiegelmanEuroSys 2022 · 被引用 259 次
- Prism: Deconstructing the Blockchain to Approach Physical LimitsVivek Kumar Bagaria, Sreeram Kannan, David Tse, Giulia Fanti 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 256 次
- Sync HotStuff: Simple and Practical Synchronous State Machine ReplicationIttai Abraham, Dahlia Malkhi, Kartik Nayak, Ling Ren 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 240 次
相关 Paper
- Ebb-and-Flow Protocols: A Resolution of the Availability-Finality DilemmaJoachim Neu, Ertem Nusret Tas, David TseS&P 2021 · 被引用 105 次
- LiDO-DAG: A Framework for Verifying Safety and Liveness of DAG-Based Consensus ProtocolsLongfei Qiu, Jingqi Xiao, Ji-Yong Shin, Zhong ShaoPLDI 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- LBFT-DAG: A Swift, Leader-Driven, DAG-Based Consortium Blockchain with Byzantine Fault-ToleranceXuewen Dong, Yi Liu, Teng Li, Xiaojie Guo 等INFOCOM 2025 · 被引用 4 次
- Shoal++: High Throughput DAG BFT Can Be Fast and Robust!Balaji Arun, Zekun Li, Florian Suri-Payer, Sourav Das 等NSDI 2025 · 被引用 37 次
- Ladder: A Convergence-based Structured DAG Blockchain for High Throughput and Low LatencyDengcheng Hu, Jianrong Wang, Xiulong Liu, Hao Xu 等NSDI 2025 · 被引用 15 次
