Three Birds with One Stone: Efficient Partitioning Attacks on Interdependent Cryptocurrency Networks
Muhammad Saad, David Mohaisen
摘要
The biased distribution of cryptocurrency nodes across Autonomous Systems (ASes) increases the risk of spatial partitioning attacks, allowing an adversary to isolate nodes by hijacking AS prefixes. Prior works on spatial partitioning attacks have mainly focused on the Bitcoin network, showing that the prominent cryptocurrency network can be paralyzed by disrupting the physical topology through BGP hijacks.Despite the persisting threat of BGP hijacks, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have not been frequently targeted, likely due to their shielded overlay topology, which limits the exposure of physical network anomalies. In this paper, we present a new perspective by examining the security of cryptocurrency networks, considering shared network resources (network interdependence). We conduct measurements extending beyond the Bitcoin network and analyze commonalities in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple node hosting patterns. We observe that all three networks are highly centralized, predominantly sharing the common ASes. We also note that among the three cryptocurrencies, Ripple does not shield its overlay topology, which can be exploited to learn about the physical network anomalies. The observed network anomalies present practical attack strategies that can be launched to target all three cryptocurrencies simultaneously. 1 We supplement our analysis by surveying recent BGP attacks on high-profile ASes and recognizing a need for application-level countermeasures. We propose attack countermeasures that reduce the risk of spatial partitioning, notwithstanding the increasing centralization of nodes and network interdependence.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- Phishing in Wonderland: Evaluating Learning-Based Ethereum Phishing Transaction Detection and PitfallsAhod Alghuried, David MohaisenNDSS 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- Hamava: Fault-tolerant Reconfigurable Geo-Replication on Heterogeneous ClustersTeias Mane, Xiao Li, Mohammad Sadoghi, Mohsen LesaniICDE 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Eclipse Attacks on Monero's Peer-to-Peer NetworkRuisheng Shi, Zhiyuan Peng, Lina Lan, Yulian Ge 等NDSS 2025
- Eclipse Attacks on Ethereum's Peer-to-Peer NetworkRuisheng Shi, Yuxuan Liang, Zijun Guo, Qin Wang 等WWW 2026
- Are Unreachable Nodes Truly Safe? Fully Eclipsing Monero's P2P Network!Ruisheng Shi, Jiaqi Zeng, Lina Lan, Shihan Zhang 等CCS 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper4
- Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on CryptocurrenciesMaria Apostolaki, Aviv Zohar, Laurent VanbeverS&P 2017 · 被引用 473 次
- Be Selfish and Avoid Dilemmas: Fork After Withholding (FAW) Attacks on BitcoinYujin Kwon, Dohyun Kim, Yunmok Son, Eugene Y. Vasserman 等CCS 2017 · 被引用 248 次
- A Stealthier Partitioning Attack against Bitcoin Peer-to-Peer NetworkMuoi Tran, Inho Choi, Gi Jun Moon, Anh V. Vu 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 126 次
- SABRE: Protecting Bitcoin against Routing AttacksMaria Apostolaki, Gian Marti, Jan Müller, Laurent VanbeverNDSS 2019 · 被引用 86 次
相关 Paper
- Routing Attacks on Cryptocurrency Mining PoolsMuoi Tran, Theo von Arx, Laurent VanbeverS&P 2024 · 被引用 7 次
- On the Routing-Aware Peering against Network-Eclipse Attacks in BitcoinMuoi Tran, Akshaye Shenoi, Min Suk KangUSENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 28 次
- Revisiting Nakamoto Consensus in Asynchronous Networks: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bitcoin Safety and ChainQualityMuhammad Saad, Afsah Anwar, Srivatsan Ravi, David MohaisenCCS 2021 · 被引用 29 次
- Erlay: Efficient Transaction Relay for BitcoinGleb Naumenko, Gregory Maxwell, Pieter Wuille, Alexandra Fedorova 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 1 次
- Lay Down the Common Metrics: Evaluating Proof-of-Work Consensus Protocols' SecurityRen Zhang, Bart PreneelS&P 2019 · 被引用 113 次
