Impact Assessment Card: Communicating Risks and Benefits of AI Uses
Edyta Paulina Bogucka, Marios Constantinides, Sanja Scepanovic, Daniele Quercia
摘要
Communicating the risks and benefits of AI is important for regulation and public understanding. Yet current methods such as technical reports often exclude people without technical expertise. Drawing on HCI research, we developed an Impact Assessment Card to present this information more clearly. We held three focus groups with a total of 12 participants who helped identify design requirements and create early versions of the card. We then tested a refined version in an online study with 235 participants, including AI developers, compliance experts, and members of the public selected to reflect the U.S. population by age, sex, and race. Participants used either the card or a full impact assessment report to write an email supporting or opposing a proposed AI system. The card led to faster task completion and higher-quality emails across all groups. We discuss how design choices can improve accessibility and support AI governance. Examples of cards are available at: https://social-dynamics.net/ai-risks/impact-card/
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Who Controls the Conversation? User Perspectives on Generative AI (LLM) System PromptsAnna Neumann, Yulu Pi, Jatinder SinghCHI 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- PASTA: A Scalable Framework for Multi-Policy AI Compliance EvaluationYu Yang, Ig-Jae Kim, Dongwook YoonCHI 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Certified AI System = Trustworthy? Exploring Expert and Lay User Perceptions and Needs Regarding AI CertificationSarah Abdelwahab Gaballah, Nur Efsan Cetinkaya, Magdalena Wischnewski, Martina Angela SasseCHI 2026 · 被引用 1 次
它引用的顶会 Paper22
- Conceptual Metaphors Impact Perceptions of Human-AI CollaborationPranav Khadpe, Ranjay Krishna, Li Fei-Fei, Jeffrey T. Hancock 等CSCW 2020 · 被引用 179 次
- Expanding Modes of Reflection in Design FuturingSandjar Kozubaev, Chris Elsden, Noura Howell, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard 等CHI 2020 · 被引用 171 次
- Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic BehaviorsHong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, Kenneth HolsteinCSCW 2021 · 被引用 156 次
- Toward User-Driven Algorithm Auditing: Investigating users' strategies for uncovering harmful algorithmic behaviorAlicia DeVos, Aditi Dhabalia, Hong Shen, Kenneth Holstein 等CHI 2022 · 被引用 96 次
- Algorithmic Risk Assessments Can Alter Human Decision-Making Processes in High-Stakes Government ContextsBen Green, Yiling ChenCSCW 2021 · 被引用 63 次
相关 Paper
- Regulating AI: Where U.S. State Policy and HCI (Mis)alignNino Migineishvili, Alice Gao, Adinawa Adjagbodjou, Dhanaraj Thakur 等CHI 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- "I think this is fair": Uncovering the Complexities of Stakeholder Decision-Making in AI Fairness AssessmentLin Luo, Yuri Nakao, Mathieu Chollet, Hiroya Inakoshi 等CHI 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Locating Risk: Task Designers and the Challenge of Risk Disclosure in Crowdsourced RAI Content Work CSCW029Alice Qian, Ryland Shaw, Laura Dabbish, Jina Suh 等CSCW 2026
- How Tech Workers Contend with Hazards of Humanlikeness in Generative AIMark Diaz, Renee Shelby, Eric Corbett, Andrew SmartCHI 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Empowering Stakeholders with Participatory Auditing of Predictive AI: Perspectives from End-Users and Decision Subjects without AI ExpertisePatrizia Di Campli San Vito, Eva Fringi, Penny S. Johnston, Leonardo C. T. Bezerra 等CHI 2026 · 被引用 3 次
