SDD: Self-Degraded Defense against Malicious Fine-tuning
Zixuan Chen, Weikai Lu, Xin Lin, Ziqian Zeng
摘要
Open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) often employ safety alignment methods to resist harmful instructions. However, recent research shows that maliciously fine-tuning these LLMs on harmful data can easily bypass these safeguards. To counter this, we theoretically uncover why malicious fine-tuning succeeds and identify potential defense strategies. Building on the theoretical analysis, we introduce the Self-Degraded Defense (SDD) framework. SDD encourages LLMs to produce high-quality but irrelevant responses to harmful prompts. When attackers attempt malicious fine-tuning, the general capability of the LLM aligned by SDD will significantly decrease, rendering it incapable of following harmful instructions. Our experimental results confirm SDD's effectiveness against such attacks. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZeroNLP/SDD .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper6
- Self-Destructive Language ModelsYuhui Wang, Rongyi Zhu, Ting WangICLR 2026 · 被引用 14 次
- Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention SinkGuozhi Liu, Weiwei Lin, Tiansheng Huang, Ruichao Mo 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 5 次
- Training with Honeypots: Reshaping How LLMs Fail Under Adversarial AttacksSamuel Simko, Punya Pandey, Zhijing Jin, Bernhard SchölkopfICML 2026
- SGT: Securing Open-Source LLMs Against Malicious Fine-tuning via Safety Guidance TriggerSunguk Shin, Fangzhao Wu, Byung-Jun Lee, Meeyoung Cha 等ACL 2026
- Toward Safe Quantization-Aware Fine-tuning: Understanding and Mitigating Safety Alignment DegradationYuning Yang, Guowei Peng, Xiurui Xie, Minrui Jiang 等ICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper15
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 1,486 次
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 569 次
- The Risks of Invariant Risk MinimizationElan Rosenfeld, Pradeep Kumar Ravikumar, Andrej RisteskiICLR 2021 · 被引用 356 次
相关 Paper
- Safety Misalignment Against Large Language ModelsYichen Gong, Delong Ran, Xinlei He, Tianshuo Cong 等NDSS 2025
- Benign Samples Matter! Fine-tuning On Outlier Benign Samples Severely Breaks SafetyZihan Guan, Mengxuan Hu, Ronghang Zhu, Sheng Li 等ICML 2025
- Safety Fine-Tuning at (Almost) No Cost: A Baseline for Vision Large Language ModelsYongshuo Zong, Ondrej Bohdal, Tingyang Yu, Yongxin Yang 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 140 次
- Antidote: Post-fine-tuning Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning AttackTiansheng Huang, Gautam Bhattacharya, Pratik Joshi, Joshua Kimball 等ICML 2025
- Bleeding Pathways: Vanishing Discriminability in LLM Hidden States Fuels Jailbreak AttacksYingjie Zhang, Tong Liu, Zhe Zhao, Guozhu Meng 等NDSS 2026 · 被引用 5 次
