Large language models can learn and generalize steganographic chain-of-thought under process supervision
Robert MC Carthy, Joey Skaf, Luis Ibañez-Lissen, Vasil Georgiev, Connor Watts, Hannes Whittingham, Lorena González-Manzano, Cameron Tice, Edward James Young, Puria Radmard, David Lindner
摘要
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning not only enhances large language model performance but also provides critical insights into decision-making processes, marking it as a useful tool for monitoring model intent and planning. However, recent works have shown that banning the mention of a specific example of reward hacking causes obfuscation of the undesired reasoning traces but the persistence of the undesired behavior, threatening the reliability of CoT monitoring. We provide an extension to these results with regard to the ability of models to learn a specific type of obfuscated reasoning: steganography. First, we show that penalizing the use of specific strings within load-bearing reasoning traces causes models to substitute alternative strings. Crucially, this does not alter the underlying method by which the model performs the task, demonstrating that the model can learn to steganographically encode its reasoning. We further demonstrate that models can generalize an encoding scheme. When the penalized strings belong to an overarching class, the model learns not only to substitute strings seen in training, but also develops a general encoding scheme for all members of the class which it can apply to held-out testing strings.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Early Signs of Steganographic Capabilities in Frontier LLMsArtur Zolkowski, Kei Nishimura-Gasparian, Robert McCarthy, Roland S. Zimmermann 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 22 次
- Reasoning Models Struggle to Control their Chains of ThoughtChen Yueh-Han, Robert McCarthy, Bruce W. Lee, He He 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 11 次
- Dynamics Within Latent Chain-of-Thought: An Empirical Study of Causal StructureZirui Li, Xuefeng Bai, Kehai Chen, Yizhi Li 等ICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 3,045 次
- Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language ModelsMrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, David Duvenaud 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 762 次
- Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via SteganographySumeet Ramesh Motwani, Mikhail Baranchuk, Martin Strohmeier, Vijay Bolina 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 140 次
- AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional SubversionRyan Greenblatt, Buck Shlegeris, Kshitij Sachan, Fabien RogerICML 2024 · 被引用 137 次
相关 Paper
- Reasoning Models Sometimes Output Illegible Chains of ThoughtArun JoseNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 11 次
- Is it Thinking or Cheating? Detecting Implicit Reward Hacking by Measuring Reasoning EffortXinpeng Wang, Nitish Joshi, Barbara Plank, Rico Angell 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 27 次
- All Code, No Thought: Language Models Struggle to Reason in Ciphered LanguageShiyuan Guo, Henry Sleight, Fabien RogerICLR 2026 · 被引用 5 次
- Output Supervision Can Obfuscate the Chain of ThoughtJacob Drori, Luke Marks, Bryce Woodworth, Alex Cloud 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 10 次
- DecepChain: Inducing Deceptive Reasoning in Large Language ModelsWei Shen, Han Wang, Haoyu Li, Huan ZhangICML 2026 · 被引用 4 次
