CLEP: A Novel Contrastive Learning Method for Evolutionary Reentrancy Vulnerability Detection
Jie Chen, Liangmin Wang, Huijuan Zhu, Victor S. Sheng
摘要
Reentrancy vulnerabilities in smart contracts have been exploited to steal enormous amounts of money, thus detecting reentrancy vulnerabilities is a hotspot issue in security research. However, a new attack is emerging in which attackers continuously release new reentrancy patterns to exploit fresh vulnerabilities and obfuscate existing ones. Existing detection methods neglect the time-series evolution of vulnerabilities across different smart contract versions, leading to a gradual decline in their effectiveness over time. We investigate the time-series correlations among vulnerabilities in various versions and refer to these as Evolutionary Reentrancy Vulnerabilities (ERVs). We summarize that ERVs detection faces two key challenges: (i) capturing the evolving pattern of ERVs along a complete evolutionary chain and (ii) detecting fresh reentrancy vulnerabilities in new versions. To address these challenges, we propose CLEP, a novel Contrastive Learning with Evolving Pairs detection method. It can effectively capture the evolving patterns by discerning similarities and differences across versions. Specifically, we first modified the sample distribution by incorporating version declarations as time-series evolution information. Then, leveraging the hierarchical similarity, we design an evolving pairs scheme to form negative and positive contract pairs across versions. Finally, we build a complete evolutionary chain by proposing a version-aware contrastive sampler. Our experimental results show that CLEP not only outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in version-specific scenarios but also shows promising performance in cross-version evolution scenarios.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper16
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 7,049 次
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 2,306 次
- GraphCodeBERT: Pre-training Code Representations with Data FlowDaya Guo, Shuo Ren, Shuai Lu, Zhangyin Feng 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 1,644 次
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 1,108 次
- Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 Ethereum smart contractsThomas Durieux, João F. Ferreira, Rui Abreu, Pedro CruzICSE 2020 · 被引用 373 次
相关 Paper
- Improving Smart Contract Security with Contrastive Learning-based Vulnerability DetectionYizhou Chen, Zeyu Sun, Zhihao Gong, Dan HaoICSE 2024 · 被引用 44 次
- Reentrancy Vulnerability Detection and Localization: A Deep Learning Based Two-phase ApproachZhuo Zhang, Yan Lei, Meng Yan, Yue Yu 等ASE 2022 · 被引用 56 次
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 被引用 298 次
- AdvSCanner: Generating Adversarial Smart Contracts to Exploit Reentrancy Vulnerabilities Using LLM and Static AnalysisYin Wu, Xiaofei Xie, Chenyang Peng, Dijun Liu 等ASE 2024 · 被引用 9 次
- Enhancing Smart Contract Security Analysis with Execution Property GraphsKaihua Qin, Zhe Ye, Zhun Wang, Weilin Li 等ISSTA 2025 · 被引用 1 次
