FP64 is All You Need: Rethinking Failure Modes in Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Chenhui Xu, Dancheng Liu, Amir Nassereldine, Jinjun Xiong
摘要
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) often exhibit "failure modes" in which the PDE residual loss converges while the solution error stays large, a phenomenon traditionally blamed on local optima separated from the true solution by steep loss barriers. We challenge this understanding by demonstrate that the real culprit is insufficient arithmetic precision: with standard FP32, the L-BFGS optimizer prematurely satisfies its convergence test, freezing the network in a spurious failure phase. Simply upgrading to FP64 rescues optimization, enabling vanilla PINNs to solve PDEs without any failure modes. These results reframe PINN failure modes as precision-induced stalls rather than inescapable local minima and expose a three-stage training dynamic-un-converged, failure, success-whose boundaries shift with numerical precision. Our findings emphasize that rigorous arithmetic precision is the key to dependable PDE solving with neural networks. Our code is
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper4
- Physics-Informed Residual FlowsJephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Phil Sidney Ostheimer, Sebastian Vollmer 等ICML 2026
- Tensor Train Diffusion: Leveraging Low-Rank Structures for High-Dimensional Score-Based SamplingRobert Gruhlke, Julius Berner, David Sommer, Lorenz RichterICML 2026
- Heavy-tailed Physics-Informed Neural NetworksJephte Abijuru, Mayank Kumar Nagda, Jan Tauberschmidt, Phil Sidney Ostheimer 等ICML 2026
- Overcoming PINNs Failure Modes In High Dimension With Low-Rank Fourier SumNatan Kaminsky, Daniel Freedman, Kira RadinskyICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper14
- Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networksAditi S. Krishnapriyan, Amir Gholami, Shandian Zhe, Robert M. Kirby 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 1,421 次
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 被引用 750 次
- Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape PerspectivePratik Rathore, Weimu Lei, Zachary Frangella, Lu Lu 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 137 次
- Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) SamplingArka Daw, Jie Bu, Sifan Wang, Paris Perdikaris 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 95 次
- Parameterized Physics-informed Neural Networks for Parameterized PDEsWoojin Cho, Minju Jo, Haksoo Lim, Kookjin Lee 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 57 次
相关 Paper
- Hypernetwork-based Meta-Learning for Low-Rank Physics-Informed Neural NetworksWoojin Cho, Kookjin Lee, Donsub Rim, Noseong ParkNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 62 次
- Accelerated Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) using Meshless DiscretizationsRamansh Sharma, Varun ShankarNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 81 次
- An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learningTim De Ryck, Florent Bonnet, Siddhartha Mishra, Emmanuel de BézenacICLR 2024 · 被引用 28 次
- Competitive Physics Informed NetworksQi Zeng, Yash Kothari, Spencer H. Bryngelson, Florian SchäferICLR 2023 · 被引用 10 次
- Taming the Loss Landscape of PINNs with Noisy Feynman–Kac Supervision: Operator Preconditioning and Non-Asymptotic Error BoundsNathanael Tepakbong, Hanyu HU, Chengyu Liu, Xiang ZHOUICML 2026
