Moral Responsibility for AI Systems
Sander Beckers
摘要
As more and more decisions that have a significant ethical dimension are being outsourced to AI systems, it is important to have a definition of moral responsibility that can be applied to AI systems. Moral responsibility for an outcome of an agent who performs some action is commonly taken to involve both a causal condition and an epistemic condition: the action should cause the outcome, and the agent should have been aware -- in some form or other -- of the possible moral consequences of their action. This paper presents a formal definition of both conditions within the framework of causal models. I compare my approach to the existing approaches of Braham and van Hees (BvH) and of Halpern and Kleiman-Weiner (HK). I then generalize my definition into a degree of responsibility.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper2
相关 Paper
- Human Perceptions on Moral Responsibility of AI: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Bail Decision-MakingGabriel Lima, Nina Grgic-Hlaca, Meeyoung ChaCHI 2021 · 被引用 71 次
- The AI Double Standard: Humans Judge All AIs for the Actions of OneAikaterina Manoli, Janet V. T. Pauketat, Jacy Reese AnthisCSCW 2025 · 被引用 10 次
- Causal, Strategic, and Combined Responsibility Attribution in Situation Calculus Concurrent Game StructuresMohammad Hossein Karimian, Shakil M. Khan, Yves LespéranceAAAI 2026
- Guilty Artificial Minds: Folk Attributions of Mens Rea and Culpability to Artificially Intelligent AgentsMichael T. Stuart, Markus KneerCSCW 2021 · 被引用 48 次
- Responsibility in Extensive Form GamesQi ShiAAAI 2024 · 被引用 5 次
