Reference-guided Policy Optimization for Molecular Optimization via LLM Reasoning
Xuan Li, Zhanke Zhou, Zongze Li, Jiangchao Yao, Yu Rong, Lu Zhang, Bo Han
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) benefit substantially from supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) in reasoning tasks. However, these recipes perform poorly in instruction-based molecular optimization, where each data point typically provides only a single optimized reference molecule and no step-by-step optimization trajectory. We reveal that answer-only SFT on the reference molecules collapses reasoning, and RLVR provides sparse feedback under similarity constraints due to the model's lack of effective exploration, which slows learning and limits optimization. To encourage the exploration of new molecules while balancing the exploitation of the reference molecules, we introduce Reference-guided Policy Optimization (RePO), an optimization approach that learns from reference molecules without requiring trajectory data. At each update, RePO samples candidate molecules with their intermediate reasoning trajectories from the model and trains the model using verifiable rewards that measure property satisfaction under similarity constraints in an RL manner. Meanwhile, it applies reference guidance by keeping the policy’s intermediate reasoning trajectory as context and training only the answer in a supervised manner. Together, the RL term promotes exploration, while the guidance term mitigates reward sparsity and stabilizes training by grounding outputs to references when many valid molecular edits exist. Across molecular optimization benchmarks, RePO consistently outperforms SFT and RLVR baselines (e.g., GRPO), achieving improvements on the optimization metric (Success Rate Similarity), improving balance across competing objectives, and generalizing better to unseen instruction styles. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/tmlr-group/RePO.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper28
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,068 次
- STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningEric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 1,126 次
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 1,109 次
相关 Paper
- A Regret Minimization Framework on Preference Learning in Large Language ModelsSuhwan Kim, Taehyun Cho, Youngsoo Jang, Geon-Hyeong Kim 等ICML 2026
- ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning NeedsCheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 387 次
- R1-ShareVL: Incentivizing Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models via Share-GRPOHuanjin Yao, Qixiang Yin, Jingyi Zhang, Min Yang 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- FlowRL: Matching Reward Distributions for LLM ReasoningXuekai Zhu, Daixuan Cheng, Dinghuai Zhang, Hengli Li 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 41 次
- Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of OptimizationJunnan Liu, Hongwei Liu, Songyang Zhang, Kai ChenICLR 2026 · 被引用 3 次
