EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs' Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework
Yao Shi, Rongkeng Liang, Yong Xu
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as educational tools, yet evaluating their teaching capabilities remains challenging due to the resource-intensive, context-dependent, and methodologically complex nature of teacher-student interactions. We introduce EducationQ, a multi-agent dialogue framework that efficiently assesses teaching capabilities through simulated dynamic educational scenarios, featuring specialized agents for teaching, learning, and evaluation. Testing 14 LLMs across major AI Organizations (OpenAI, Meta, Google, Anthropic, and others) on 1,498 questions spanning 13 disciplines and 10 difficulty levels reveals that teaching effectiveness does not correlate linearly with model scale or general reasoning capabilities - with some smaller open-source models outperforming larger commercial counterparts in teaching contexts. This finding highlights a critical gap in current evaluations that prioritize knowledge recall over interactive pedagogy. Our mixed-methods evaluation, combining quantitative metrics with qualitative analysis and expert case studies, identifies distinct pedagogical strengths employed by top-performing models (e.g., sophisticated questioning strategies, adaptive feedback mechanisms). Human expert evaluations show 78% agreement with our automated qualitative analysis of effective teaching behaviors, validating our methodology. EducationQ demonstrates that LLMs-as-teachers require specialized optimization beyond simple scaling, suggesting next-generation educational AI prioritize targeted enhancement of specific pedagogical effectiveness.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- A Theory of Adaptive Scaffolding for LLM-Based Pedagogical AgentsClayton Cohn, Surya Rayala, Namrata Srivastava, Joyce Horn Fonteles 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in English EducationJingheng Ye, Shen Wang, Deqing Zou, Yibo Yan 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- EduBench: A Comprehensive Benchmarking Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Diverse Educational ScenariosBin Xu, Yu Bai, Huashan Sun, Yiguan Lin 等ACL 2026
- Teach2Eval: An Interaction-Driven LLMs Evaluation Method via Teaching EffectivenessYuhang Zhou, Xutian Chen, Yixin Cao, Yuchen Ni 等ICLR 2026
- Beyond Self-Report: Bridging the Intention-Behavior Gap in Critical Thinking Assessment via Interpretable Multi-Agent SystemZekun Li, Jifan Yu, Haoxuan Li, Ye He 等ACL 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 4,966 次
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris 等UIST 2023 · 被引用 1,882 次
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu 等ACL 2023 · 被引用 540 次
- Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP TasksYizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi 等EMNLP 2022 · 被引用 238 次
相关 Paper
- Dr.Academy: A Benchmark for Evaluating Questioning Capability in Education for Large Language ModelsYuyan Chen, Songzhou Yan, Panjun Liu, Yanghua XiaoACL 2024 · 被引用 8 次
- Can Large Language Models Be Good Language Teachers?LiQing Xu, Qiwei Li, Tianshuo Peng, Zuchao Li 等EMNLP 2025
- EduAdapt: A Question Answer Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Grade-Level Adaptability in LLMsNumaan Naeem, Abdellah El Mekki, Muhammad Abdul-MageedEMNLP 2025
- Simulated Students in Tutoring Dialogues: Substance or Illusion?Alexander Scarlatos, Jaewook Lee, Simon Woodhead, Andrew LanACL 2026 · 被引用 6 次
- Grounded in Reality: Learning and Deploying Proactive LLM from Offline LogsFei Wei, Daoyuan Chen, Ce Wang, Yilun Huang 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
