A Security Framework for Distributed Ledgers
Mike Graf, Daniel Rausch, Viktoria Ronge, Christoph Egger, Ralf Küsters, Dominique Schröder
摘要
In the past few years blockchains have been a major focus for security research, resulting in significant progress in the design, formalization, and analysis of blockchain protocols. However, the more general class of distributed ledgers, which includes not just blockchains but also prominent non-blockchain protocols, such as Corda and OmniLedger, cannot be covered by the state-of-the-art in the security literature yet. These distributed ledgers often break with traditional blockchain paradigms, such as block structures to store data, system-wide consensus, or global consistency. In this paper, we close this gap by proposing the first framework for defining and analyzing the security of general distributed ledgers, with an ideal distributed ledger functionality, called Fledger, at the core of our contribution. This functionality covers not only classical blockchains but also non-blockchain distributed ledgers in a unified way. To illustrate Fledger, we first show that the prominent ideal block-chain functionalities Gledger and GPL realize (suitable instantiations of) Fledger, which captures their security properties. This implies that their respective implementations, including Bitcoin, Ouroboros Genesis, and Ouroboros Crypsinous, realize Fledger as well. Secondly, we demonstrate that Fledger is capable of precisely modeling also non-blockchain distributed ledgers by performing the first formal security analysis of such a distributed ledger, namely the prominent Corda protocol. Due to the wide spread use of Corda in industry, in particular the financial sector, this analysis is of independent interest. These results also illustrate that Fledger not just generalizes the modular treatment of blockchains to distributed ledgers, but moreover helps to unify existing results.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Embedding the UC Model into the IITM ModelDaniel Rausch, Ralf Küsters, Céline ChevalierEUROCRYPT 2022 · 被引用 3 次
- AUC: Accountable Universal ComposabilityMike Graf, Ralf Küsters, Daniel RauschS&P 2023
它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart ContractsAhmed E. Kosba, Andrew Miller, Elaine Shi, Zikai Wen 等S&P 2016 · 被引用 2,201 次
- A Secure Sharding Protocol For Open BlockchainsLoi Luu, Viswesh Narayanan, Chaodong Zheng, Kunal Baweja 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 1,392 次
- OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via ShardingEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly 等S&P 2018 · 被引用 1,145 次
- RapidChain: Scaling Blockchain via Full ShardingMahdi Zamani, Mahnush Movahedi, Mariana RaykovaCCS 2018 · 被引用 1,084 次
- Ouroboros Genesis: Composable Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Dynamic AvailabilityChristian Badertscher, Peter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 306 次
相关 Paper
- Mneme: A Mobile Distributed LedgerDimitris Chatzopoulos, Sujit Gujar, Boi Faltings, Pan HuiINFOCOM 2020 · 被引用 11 次
- Ouroboros Crypsinous: Privacy-Preserving Proof-of-StakeThomas Kerber, Aggelos Kiayias, Markulf Kohlweiss, Vassilis ZikasS&P 2019 · 被引用 82 次
- Blockchains vs. Distributed Databases: Dichotomy and FusionPingcheng Ruan, Tien Tuan Anh Dinh, Dumitrel Loghin, Meihui Zhang 等SIGMOD 2021 · 被引用 68 次
- Lay Down the Common Metrics: Evaluating Proof-of-Work Consensus Protocols' SecurityRen Zhang, Bart PreneelS&P 2019 · 被引用 113 次
- FireLedger: A High Throughput Blockchain Consensus ProtocolYehonatan Buchnik, Roy FriedmanVLDB 2020 · 被引用 19 次
