Are Semantic Networks Associated with Idea Originality in Artificial Creativity? A Comparison with Human Agents
Umberto Domanti, Lorenzo Campidelli, Sergio Agnoli, Antonella De Angeli
摘要
The application of generative artificial intelligence in Creativity Support Tools (CSTs) presents the challenge of interfacing two black boxes: the user's mind and the machine engine. According to Artificial Cognition, this challenge involves theories, methods, and constructs developed to study human creativity. Consistently, the paper investigated the relationship between semantic networks organisation and idea originality in Large Language Models. Data was collected by administering a set of standardised tests to ChatGPT-4o and 81 psychology students, divided into higher and lower creative individuals. The expected relationship was confirmed in the comparison between ChatGPT-4o and higher creative humans. However, despite having a more rigid network, ChatGPT-4o emerged as more original than lower creative humans. We attributed this difference to human motivational processes and model hyperparameters, advancing a research agenda for the study of artificial creativity. In conclusion, we illustrate the potential of this construct for designing and evaluating CSTs.
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; HCI theory, concepts and models.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AILev Tankelevitch, Viktor Kewenig, Auste Simkute, Ava Elizabeth Scott 等CHI 2024 · 被引用 279 次
- Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of CreativityTuhin Chakrabarty, Philippe Laban, Divyansh Agarwal, Smaranda Muresan 等CHI 2024 · 被引用 122 次
- Human Creativity in the Age of LLMs: Randomized Experiments on Divergent and Convergent ThinkingHarsh Kumar, Jonathan Vincentius, Ewan Jordan, Ashton AndersonCHI 2025 · 被引用 107 次
- Towards a Diffractive Analysis of Prompt-Based Generative AINina Rajcic, Maria Teresa Llano Rodriguez, Jon McCormackCHI 2024 · 被引用 37 次
相关 Paper
- Exploring the Impact of AI-powered Creativity Support Tools on Professional Creative WorkflowsCaterina Moruzzi, Charlotte Bird, Laura Mariah HermanCSCW 2026
- MuseScorer: Idea Originality Scoring At ScaleAli Sarosh Bangash, Krish Veera, Ishfat Abrar Islam, Raiyan Abdul BatenEMNLP 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Intelligent Support Engages Writers Through Relevant Cognitive ProcessesAndreas Göldi, Thiemo Wambsganss, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Roman RietscheCHI 2024 · 被引用 20 次
- CreAItive Collaboration? Users' Misjudgment of AI-Creativity Affects Their Collaborative PerformanceMia Magdalena Bangerl, Leonie Disch, Tamara David, Viktoria Pammer-SchindlerCHI 2025 · 被引用 13 次
- Timing Matters: How Using LLMs at Different Timings Influences Writers' Perceptions and Ideation Outcomes in AI-Assisted IdeationPeinuan Qin, Chi-Lan Yang, Jingshu Li, Jing Wen 等CHI 2025 · 被引用 19 次
