Language Models Can Predict Their Own Behavior
Dhananjay Ashok, Jonathan May
摘要
The text produced by language models (LMs) can exhibit specific 'behaviors,' such as a failure to follow alignment training, that we hope to detect and react to during deployment. Identifying these behaviors can often only be done post facto, i.e., after the entire text of the output has been generated. We provide evidence that there are times when we can predict how an LM will behave early in computation, before even a single token is generated. We show that probes trained on the internal representation of input tokens alone can predict a wide range of eventual behaviors over the entire output sequence. Using methods from conformal prediction, we provide provable bounds on the estimation error of our probes, creating precise early warning systems for these behaviors. The conformal probes can identify instances that will trigger alignment failures (jailbreaking) and instruction-following failures, without requiring a single token to be generated. An early warning system built on the probes reduces jailbreaking by 91%. Our probes also show promise in pre-emptively estimating how confident the model will be in its response, a behavior that cannot be detected using the output text alone. Conformal probes can preemptively estimate the final prediction of an LM that uses Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, hence accelerating inference. When applied to an LM that uses CoT to perform text classification, the probes drastically reduce inference costs (65% on average across 27 datasets), with negligible accuracy loss. Encouragingly, probes generalize to unseen datasets and perform better on larger models, suggesting applicability to the largest of models in real-world settings. 1
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper4
- Reasoning Theater: Disentangling Model Beliefs from Chain-of-ThoughtSiddharth Boppana, Annabel Ma, Max Loeffler, Raphaël Sarfati 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 30 次
- Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM SafetySeongmin Lee, Aeree Cho, Grace C. Kim, Shengyun Peng 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Less is More: Geometric Unlearning for LLMs with Minimal Data DisclosureChenchen Tan, Xinghao Li, Shujie Cui, Youyang Qu 等ICML 2026
- From Input Perception to Predictive Insight: Modeling Model Blind Spots Before They Become ErrorsMaggie Mi, Aline Villavicencio, Nafise Sadat MoosaviEMNLP 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper27
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,068 次
相关 Paper
- Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting GenerationYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Mengzhou Xia, Kai Li 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 481 次
- "I've Decided to Leak": Probing Internals Behind Prompt Leakage IntentsJianshuo Dong, Yutong Zhang, Liu Yan, Zhenyu Zhong 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Defending Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models via Manifold Trajectory KineticsHangtao Zhang, Yucheng Zhao, Sishun Liu, Ziqi Zhou 等USENIX Security 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Quantifying Large Language Model Attacks Through the Lens of Model CognitionXiuming Liu, Chaoxiang He, Xuanran Yu, Jichen Chai 等USENIX Security 2026
- Mission Impossible: A Statistical Perspective on Jailbreaking LLMsJingtong Su, Julia Kempe, Karen UllrichNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 38 次
