PoCGen: Generating Proof-of-Concept Exploits for Vulnerabilities in Npm Packages
Deniz Simsek, Aryaz Eghbali, Michael Pradel
摘要
Security vulnerabilities in software packages are a significant concern for developers and users alike. Patching these vulnerabilities in a timely manner is crucial to restoring the integrity and security of software systems. However, previous work has shown that vulnerability reports often lack proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits, which are essential for fixing the vulnerability, testing patches, and avoiding regressions. Creating a PoC exploit is challenging because vulnerability reports are informal and often incomplete, and because it requires a detailed understanding of how inputs passed to potentially vulnerable APIs may reach security-relevant sinks. In this paper, we present PoCGen, a novel approach to autonomously generate and validate PoC exploits for vulnerabilities in npm packages. The approach combines the complementary strengths of LLMs (e.g., understanding informal vulnerability reports), static analysis (e.g., identifying taint paths), and dynamic analysis (e.g., validating generated exploits). PoCGen successfully generates exploits for 71% of the vulnerabilities in the SecBench.js dataset. This success rate significantly outperforms a recent baseline (by 38 absolute percentage points), while imposing an average cost of only $0.02 per generated exploit. Moreover, PoCGen generates successful exploits for 60% of 126 recent real-world vulnerabilities, which helped augment five recent vulnerability reports in the GitHub Security Advisories database with PoCGen-generated PoC exploits.
CCS Concepts: • Security and privacy → Software and application security.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- V2E: Validating Smart Contract Vulnerabilities through Profit-Driven Exploit Generation and ExecutionJingwen Zhang, Yuhong Nan, Kaiwen Ning, Mingxi Ye 等FSE 2026
- PAGENT: Program Analysis Guided LLM Agent for Proof-of-Concept GenerationAchintya Desai, Md Shafiuzzaman, Wenbo Guo, Tevfik BultanISSTA 2026
- Exploring Motif-based Heterogeneous Graph Learning for ReDoS DetectionHong Huang, Chengyu Yao, Rongchen Li, Weihao Su 等ICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper28
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 2,059 次
- A Security Analysis of HoneywordsDing Wang, Haibo Cheng, Ping Wang, Jeff Yan 等NDSS 2018 · 被引用 1,102 次
- Coverage-based Greybox Fuzzing as Markov ChainMarcel Böhme, Van-Thuan Pham, Abhik RoychoudhuryCCS 2016 · 被引用 1,026 次
- Evaluating Fuzz TestingGeorge Klees, Andrew Ruef, Benji Cooper, Shiyi Wei 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 753 次
- Vulnerability detection with fine-grained interpretationsYi Li, Shaohua Wang, Tien N. NguyenFSE 2021 · 被引用 283 次
相关 Paper
- PoCE: Automated Proof-of-Concept Synthesis using Large Language Models for Robust ValidationTanusree Das Tithy, Lamia Hasan Rodoshi, Ayman Rafid Azahar, Amlan Abhidarshi 等ISSTA 2026
- Automated Exploit Generation for Node.js PackagesFilipe Marques, Mafalda Ferreira, André Nascimento, Miguel E. Coimbra 等PLDI 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- Learning from the Past: Real-World Exploit Migration for Smart Contract PoC GenerationKairan Sun, Zhengzi Xu, Kaixuan Li, Lyuye Zhang 等ASE 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security TasksHwiwon Lee, Ziqi Zhang, Hanxiao Lu, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 86 次
- SemFuzz: Semantics-based Automatic Generation of Proof-of-Concept ExploitsWei You, Peiyuan Zong, Kai Chen, XiaoFeng Wang 等CCS 2017 · 被引用 148 次
