Disentangling Safe and Unsafe Image Corruptions via Anisotropy and Locality
Ramchandran Muthukumar, Ambar Pal, Jeremias Sulam, René Vidal
摘要
State-of-the-art machine learning systems are vulnerable to small perturbations to their input, where "small" is defined according to a threat model that assigns a positive threat to each perturbation. Most prior works define a task-agnostic, isotropic, and global threat, like the ℓ p norm, where the magnitude of the perturbation fully determines the degree of the threat and neither the direction of the attack nor its position in space matter. However, common corruptions in computer vision, such as blur, compression, or occlusions, are not well captured by such threat models. This paper proposes a novel threat model called Projected Displacement (PD) to study robustness beyond existing isotropic and global threat models. The proposed threat model measures the threat of a perturbation via its alignment with unsafe directions, defined as directions in the input space along which a perturbation of sufficient magnitude changes the ground truth class label. Unsafe directions are identified locally for each input based on observed training data. In this way, the PD-threat model exhibits anisotropy and locality. Experiments on Imagenet-1k data indicate that, for any input, the set of perturbations with small PD threat includes safe perturbations of large ℓ p norm that preserve the true label, such as noise, blur and compression, while simultaneously excluding unsafe perturbations that alter the true label. Unlike perceptual threat models based on embeddings of large-vision models, the PD-threat model can be readily computed for arbitrary classification tasks without pre-training or finetuning. Further additional task information such as sensitivity to image regions or concept hierarchies can be easily integrated into the assessment of threat and thus the PD threat model presents practitioners with a flexible, task-driven threat specification that alleviates the limitations of ℓ p -threat models.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper16
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 被引用 2,337 次
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 1,026 次
- Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous DrivingYulong Cao, Chaowei Xiao, Benjamin Cyr, Yimeng Zhou 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 626 次
- Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object RecognitionKai Yuanqing Xiao, Logan Engstrom, Andrew Ilyas, Aleksander MadryICLR 2021 · 被引用 451 次
- DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic DataStephanie Fu, Netanel Tamir, Shobhita Sundaram, Lucy Chai 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 413 次
相关 Paper
- Towards Verifying Robustness of Neural Networks Against A Family of Semantic PerturbationsJeet Mohapatra, Tsui-Wei Weng, Pin-Yu Chen, Sijia Liu 等CVPR 2020
- Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary AttackFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 被引用 597 次
- Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat ModelsCassidy Laidlaw, Sahil Singla, Soheil FeiziICLR 2021 · 被引用 217 次
- GSmooth: Certified Robustness against Semantic Transformations via Generalized Randomized SmoothingZhongkai Hao, Chengyang Ying, Yinpeng Dong, Hang Su 等ICML 2022 · 被引用 27 次
- Which Models have Perceptually-Aligned Gradients? An Explanation via Off-Manifold RobustnessSuraj Srinivas, Sebastian Bordt, Himabindu LakkarajuNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 24 次
