BSHUNTER: Detecting and Tracing Defects of Bitcoin Scripts
Peilin Zheng, Xiapu Luo, Zibin Zheng
摘要
Supporting the most popular cryptocurrency, the Bitcoin platform allows its transactions to be programmable via its scripts. Defects in Bitcoin scripts will make users lose their bitcoins. However, there are few studies on the defects of Bitcoin scripts. In this paper, we conduct the first systematic investigation on the defects of Bitcoin scripts through three steps, including defect definition, defect detection, and exploitation tracing. First, we define six typical defects of scripts in Bitcoin history, namely unbinded-txid, simple-key, useless-sig, uncertain-sig, impossible-key, and never-true. Three are inspired by the community, and three are new from us. Second, we develop a tool to discover Bitcoin scripts with any of typical defects based on symbolic execution and enhanced by historical exact scripts. By analyzing all Bitcoin transactions from Oct. 2009 to Aug. 2022, we find that 383,544 transaction outputs are paid to the Bitcoin scripts with defects. The total amount of them is 3,115.43 BTC, which is around 60 million dollars at present. Third, in order to trace the exploitation of the defects, we instrument the Bitcoin VM to record the traces of the real-world spending transactions of the buggy scripts. We find that 84,130 output scripts are exploited. The implementation and non-harmful datasets are released.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper3
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 2,306 次
- sFuzz: an efficient adaptive fuzzer for solidity smart contractsTai D. Nguyen, Long H. Pham, Jun Sun, Yun Lin 等ICSE 2020 · 被引用 260 次
- BlockSci: Design and applications of a blockchain analysis platformHarry A. Kalodner, Malte Möser, Kevin Lee, Steven Goldfeder 等USENIX Security 2020
相关 Paper
- WalleTruth: Visual-Oriented Software Testing for Web3 Wallet Browser ExtensionsXiaohui Hu, Ningyu He, Haoyu WangFSE 2026
- teEther: Gnawing at Ethereum to Automatically Exploit Smart ContractsJohannes Krupp, Christian RossowUSENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 345 次
- SmarTest: Effectively Hunting Vulnerable Transaction Sequences in Smart Contracts through Language Model-Guided Symbolic ExecutionSunbeom So, Seongjoon Hong, Hakjoo OhUSENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 118 次
- Blockchain Address PoisoningTaro Tsuchiya, Jin-Dong Dong, Kyle Soska, Nicolas ChristinUSENIX Security 2025
- BlockScope: Detecting and Investigating Propagated Vulnerabilities in Forked Blockchain ProjectsXiao Yi, Yuzhou Fang, Daoyuan Wu, Lingxiao JiangNDSS 2023
