Failure Cases Are Better Learned but Boundary Says Sorry: Facilitating Smooth Perception Change for Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off in Adversarial Training
Yanyun Wang, Li Liu
摘要
Adversarial Training (AT) is one of the most effective methods to train robust Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). However, AT creates an inherent trade-off between clean accuracy and adversarial robustness, which is commonly attributed to the more complicated decision boundary caused by the insufficient learning of hard adversarial samples. In this work, we reveal a counterintuitive fact for the first time: From the perspective of perception consistency, hard adversarial samples that can still attack the robust model after AT are already learned better than those successfully defended. Thus, different from previous views, we argue that it is rather the over-sufficient learning of hard adversarial samples that degrades the decision boundary and contributes to the trade-off problem. Specifically, the excessive pursuit of perception consistency would force the model to view the perturbations as noise and ignore the information within them, which should have been utilized to induce a smoother perception transition towards the decision boundary to support its establishment to an appropriate location. In response, we define a new AT objective named Robust Perception, encouraging the model perception to change smoothly with input perturbations, based on which we propose a novel Robust Perception Adversarial Training (RPAT) method, effectively mitigating the current accuracy-robustness trade-off. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet with ResNet-18, PreActResNet-18, and WideResNet-34-10 demonstrate the effectiveness of our method beyond four common baselines and 12 state-of-the-art (SOTA) works. The code is available at https://github.com/FlaAI/RPAT.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper26
- CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers With Localizable FeaturesSangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Sanghyuk Chun, Seong Joon Oh 等ICCV 2019 · 被引用 5,843 次
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 被引用 2,337 次
- Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural NetworksWeilin Xu, David Evans, Yanjun QiNDSS 2018 · 被引用 1,633 次
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 1,026 次
- Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust GeneralizationDongxian Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 917 次
相关 Paper
- Consistency Regularization for Adversarial RobustnessJihoon Tack, Sihyun Yu, Jongheon Jeong, Minseon Kim 等AAAI 2022 · 被引用 75 次
- Adversarial Finetuning with Latent Representation Constraint to Mitigate Accuracy-Robustness TradeoffSatoshi Suzuki, Shin'ya Yamaguchi, Shoichiro Takeda, Sekitoshi Kanai 等ICCV 2023 · 被引用 8 次
- Adversarial Training on Purification (AToP): Advancing Both Robustness and GeneralizationGuang Lin, Chao Li, Jianhai Zhang, Toshihisa Tanaka 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 25 次
- Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat ModelsCassidy Laidlaw, Sahil Singla, Soheil FeiziICLR 2021 · 被引用 217 次
- Reducing Excessive Margin to Achieve a Better Accuracy vs. Robustness Trade-offRahul Rade, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-DezfooliICLR 2022 · 被引用 166 次
