ReAcTable: Enhancing ReAct for Table Question Answering
Yunjia Zhang, Jordan Henkel, Avrilia Floratou, Joyce Cahoon, Shaleen Deep, Jignesh M. Patel
摘要
Table Question Answering (TQA) presents a substantial challenge at the intersection of natural language processing and data analytics. This task involves answering natural language (NL) questions on top of tabular data, demanding proficiency in logical reasoning, understanding of data semantics, and fundamental analytical capabilities. Due to its significance, a substantial volume of research has been dedicated to exploring a wide range of strategies aimed at tackling this challenge including approaches that leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) through in-context learning or Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting as well as approaches that train and fine-tune custom models.
Nonetheless, a conspicuous gap exists in the research landscape, where there is limited exploration of how innovative foundational research, which integrates incremental reasoning with external tools in the context of LLMs, as exemplified by the ReAct paradigm, could potentially bring advantages to the TQA task. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap, by introducing ReAcTable ( ReAct for Table Question Answering tasks), a framework inspired by the ReAct paradigm that is carefully enhanced to address the challenges uniquely appearing in TQA tasks such as interpreting complex data semantics, dealing with errors generated by inconsistent data and generating intricate data transformations. ReAcTable relies on external tools such as SQL and Python code executors, to progressively enhance the data by generating intermediate data representations, ultimately transforming it into a more accessible format for answering the user's questions with greater ease. Through extensive empirical evaluations using three popular TQA benchmarks, we demonstrate that ReAcTable achieves remarkable performance even when compared to fine-tuned approaches. In particular, it outperforms the best prior result on the WikiTQ benchmark by 2.1%, achieving an accuracy of 68.0% without requiring training a new model or fine-tuning.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper33
- GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian OptimizationJiale Lao, Yibo Wang, Yufei Li, Jianping Wang 等VLDB 2024 · 被引用 76 次
- CodeV: Code with Images for Faithful Visual Reasoning via Tool-Aware Policy OptimizationXinhai Hou, Shaoyuan Xu, Manan Biyani, Moyan Li 等CVPR 2026 · 被引用 25 次
- Beluga: A CXL-Based Memory Architecture for Scalable and Efficient LLM KVCache ManagementXinjun Yang, Qingda Hu, Junru Li, Feifei Li 等SIGMOD 2026 · 被引用 24 次
- TableMaster: A Recipe to Advance Table Understanding with Language ModelsLang Cao, Hanbing LiuICLR 2026 · 被引用 20 次
- MultiVis-Agent: A Multi-Agent Framework with Logic Rules for Reliable and Comprehensive Cross-Modal Data VisualizationJinwei Lu, Yuanfeng Song, Chen Zhang, Raymond Chi-Wing WongSIGMOD 2026 · 被引用 14 次
它引用的顶会 Paper14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,068 次
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger 等AAAI 2024 · 被引用 1,292 次
- True Few-Shot Learning with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Douwe Kiela, Kyunghyun ChoNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 547 次
相关 Paper
- Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and EvaluationWei Zhou, Bolei Ma, Annemarie Friedrich, Mohsen MesgarACL 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- API-Assisted Code Generation for Question Answering on Varied Table StructuresYihan Cao, Shuyi Chen, Ryan Liu, Zhiruo Wang 等EMNLP 2023 · 被引用 6 次
- Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table UnderstandingZilong Wang, Hao Zhang, Chun-Liang Li, Julian Martin Eisenschlos 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 244 次
- Weaver: Interweaving SQL and LLM for Table ReasoningRohit Khoja, Devanshu Gupta, Yanjie Fu, Dan Roth 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- When TableQA Meets Noise: A Dual Denoising Framework for Complex Questions and Large-scale TablesShenghao Ye, Yu Guo, Dong Jin, Yuxiang Wang 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 8 次
