KScope: A Framework for Characterizing the Knowledge Status of Language Models
Yuxin Xiao, Shan Chen, Jack Gallifant, Danielle S. Bitterman, Tom Hartvigsen, Marzyeh Ghassemi
摘要
Characterizing a large language model's (LLM's) knowledge of a given question is challenging. As a result, prior work has primarily examined LLM behavior under knowledge conflicts, where the model's internal parametric memory contradicts information in the external context. However, this does not fully reflect how well the model knows the answer to the question. In this paper, we first introduce a taxonomy of five knowledge statuses based on the consistency and correctness of LLM knowledge modes. We then propose KScope, a hierarchical framework of statistical tests that progressively refines hypotheses about knowledge modes and characterizes LLM knowledge into one of these five statuses. We apply KScope to nine LLMs across four datasets and systematically establish: (1) Supporting context narrows knowledge gaps across models. (2) Context features related to difficulty, relevance, and familiarity drive successful knowledge updates. (3) LLMs exhibit similar feature preferences when partially correct or conflicted, but diverge sharply when consistently wrong. (4) Context summarization constrained by our feature analysis, together with enhanced credibility, further improves update effectiveness and generalizes across LLMs.
We summarize our contributions 1 in this paper as follows:
• We define a taxonomy of five knowledge statuses based on consistency and correctness, and propose KScope, a hierarchical testing framework to characterize LLM knowledge status.
• We apply KScope to nine LLMs across four datasets, and establish that supporting context substantially narrows knowledge gaps across model sizes and families.
• We identify key context features related to difficulty, relevance, and familiarity that drive successful knowledge updates.
• We reveal how LLM feature importance differs based on parametric knowledge status, showing similarity under conflict but divergence when consistently wrong.
• We validate that constrained context summarization, combined with improved credibility, significantly boosts successful knowledge updates across all statuses and generalizes well.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper31
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 19,162 次
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,798 次
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 1,549 次
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,072 次
相关 Paper
- Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models: A SurveyMoxin Li, Yong Zhao, Wenxuan Zhang, Shuaiyi Li 等ACL 2025 · 被引用 33 次
- Knowledge Conflicts for LLMs: A SurveyRongwu Xu, Zehan Qi, Zhijiang Guo, Cunxiang Wang 等EMNLP 2024 · 被引用 38 次
- KGQuiz: Evaluating the Generalization of Encoded Knowledge in Large Language ModelsYuyang Bai, Shangbin Feng, Vidhisha Balachandran, Zhaoxuan Tan 等WWW 2024 · 被引用 6 次
- Probing the Knowledge Boundary: An Interactive Agentic Framework for Deep Knowledge ExtractionYuheng Yang, Siqi Zhu, Tao Feng, Ge Liu 等ICML 2026
- Are LLMs Really Not Knowledgeable? Mining the Submerged Knowledge in LLMs' MemoryXingjian Tao, Yiwei Wang, Yujun Cai, Zhicheng Yang 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 1 次
