How Many Quantum Circuit Identities Are Needed to Generate All Others?

Abstract Quantum circuit optimizers use rewrite rules from circuit equivalences, yet prior work has identified thousands of such identities, creating substantial challenges for their storage, management, and effective application. For many widely used unitary gate sets, including Clifford+T, this apparent complexity is largely redundant, raising a fundamental question: How many quantum circuit identities are actually needed to generate all others? In this work, we provide strong evidence that a small pruned set of identities suffices to generate all circuit equivalences of bounded depth. Surprisingly, for circuits on up to nine qubits in which each side of an equality has depth at most ten, fewer than twenty identities are sufficient to derive all others, and for circuits on up to five qubits with depth at most ten, only 17 rules–each involving at most three qubits–are enough. These results enable significantly more compact and efficient rewriting systems for quantum compiler optimization and reveal underlying algebraic structure in common gate sets, showing that the vast majority of known circuit identities are consequences of a small foundational basis.