Locally Invariant Explanations: Towards Stable and Unidirectional Explanations through Local Invariant Learning
Amit Dhurandhar, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Kartik Ahuja, Vijay Arya
摘要
Locally interpretable model agnostic explanations (LIME) method is one of the most popular methods used to explain black-box models at a per example level. Although many variants have been proposed, few provide a simple way to produce high fidelity explanations that are also stable and intuitive. In this work, we provide a novel perspective by proposing a model agnostic local explanation method inspired by the invariant risk minimization (IRM) principle -originally proposed for (global) out-of-distribution generalization -to provide such high fidelity explanations that are also stable and unidirectional across nearby examples. Our method is based on a game theoretic formulation where we theoretically show that our approach has a strong tendency to eliminate features where the gradient of the black-box function abruptly changes sign in the locality of the example we want to explain, while in other cases it is more careful and will choose a more conservative (feature) attribution, a behavior which can be highly desirable for recourse. Empirically, we show on tabular, image and text data that the quality of our explanations with neighborhoods formed using random perturbations are much better than LIME and in some cases even comparable to other methods that use realistic neighbors sampled from the data manifold. This is desirable given that learning a manifold to either create realistic neighbors or to project explanations is typically expensive or may even be impossible. Moreover, our algorithm is simple and efficient to train, and can ascertain stable input features for local decisions of a black-box without access to side information such as a (partial) causal graph as has been seen in some recent works. * Equal contribution Preprint. Under review.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Trust Regions for Explanations via Black-Box Probabilistic CertificationAmit Dhurandhar, Swagatam Haldar, Dennis Wei, Karthikeyan Natesan RamamurthyICML 2024 · 被引用 3 次
- Distribution-Based Feature Attribution for Explaining the Predictions of Any ClassifierXinpeng Li, Kai Ming TingAAAI 2026
- GEFA: A General Feature Attribution Framework Using Proxy Gradient EstimationYi Cai, Thibaud Ardoin, Gerhard WunderICML 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Environment Inference for Invariant LearningElliot Creager, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Richard S. ZemelICML 2021 · 被引用 454 次
- Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilityChristopher Frye, Colin Rowat, Ilya FeigeNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 246 次
- Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex ModelsTom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom ClaassenNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 235 次
- Fairwashing explanations with off-manifold detergentChristopher J. Anders, Plamen Pasliev, Ann-Kathrin Dombrowski, Klaus-Robert Müller 等ICML 2020 · 被引用 104 次
- Robust and Stable Black Box ExplanationsHimabindu Lakkaraju, Nino Arsov, Osbert BastaniICML 2020 · 被引用 93 次
相关 Paper
- Sparse and Faithful Local Explanations with Piecewise Linear SurrogatesYixin Wang, Yucheng DongICML 2026
- GLIME: General, Stable and Local LIME ExplanationZeren Tan, Yang Tian, Jian LiNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 56 次
- Regional Explanations: Bridging Local and Global Variable ImportanceSalim I. Amoukou, Nicolas J.-B. BrunelNeurIPS 2025
- FIMAP: Feature Importance by Minimal Adversarial PerturbationMatt Chapman-Rounds, Umang Bhatt, Erik Pazos, Marc-Andre Schulz 等AAAI 2021 · 被引用 14 次
- Is this the Right Neighborhood? Accurate and Query Efficient Model Agnostic ExplanationsAmit Dhurandhar, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Karthikeyan ShanmugamNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 9 次
