Distributed Quantum inner product estimation
Anurag Anshu, Zeph Landau, Yunchao Liu
摘要
As small quantum computers are becoming available on different physical platforms, a benchmarking task known as cross-platform verification has been proposed that aims to estimate the fidelity of states prepared on two quantum computers. This task is fundamentally distributed, as no quantum communication can be performed between the two physical platforms due to hardware constraints, which prohibits a joint SWAP test. In this paper we settle the sample complexity of this task across all measurement and communication settings. The essence of the task, which we call distributed quantum inner product estimation, involves two players Alice and Bob who have k copies of unknown states ρ, σ (acting on C d ) respectively. Their goal is to estimate Tr(ρσ) up to additive error ε ∈ (0, 1), using local quantum operations and classical communication. In the weakest setting where only non-adaptive single-copy measurements and simultaneous message passing are allowed, we show that k = O(max1/ε 2 , √ d/ε) copies suffice. This achieves a savings compared to full tomography which takes Ω(d 3 ) copies with single-copy measurements. Surprisingly, we also show that the sample complexity must be at least Ω(max1/ε 2 , √ d/ε), even in the strongest setting where adaptive multi-copy measurements and arbitrary rounds of communication are allowed. This shows that the success achieved by shadow tomography, for sample-efficiently learning the properties of a single system, cannot be generalized to the distributed setting. Furthermore, the fact that the sample complexity remains the same with single and multi-copy measurements contrasts with single system quantum property testing, which often demonstrate exponential separations in sample complexity with single and multi-copy measurements.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper6
- Tight Bounds for Quantum State Certification with Incoherent MeasurementsSitan Chen, Jerry Li, Brice Huang, Allen LiuFOCS 2022 · 被引用 19 次
- Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled MeasurementsRyan O'Donnell, Chirag WadhwaSTOC 2026 · 被引用 14 次
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 被引用 13 次
- On Estimating the Trace of Quantum State PowersYupan Liu, Qisheng WangSODA 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- Beating full state tomography for unentangled spectrum estimationAngelos Pelecanos, Xinyu Tan, Ewin Tang, John WrightSODA 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper3
- Exponential Separations Between Learning With and Without Quantum MemorySitan Chen, Jordan Cotler, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jerry LiFOCS 2021 · 被引用 79 次
- Improved Quantum data analysisCostin Badescu, Ryan O'DonnellSTOC 2021 · 被引用 40 次
- Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property TestingSébastien Bubeck, Sitan Chen, Jerry LiFOCS 2020 · 被引用 33 次
相关 Paper
- An Optimal Tradeoff between Entanglement and Copy Complexity for State TomographySitan Chen, Jerry Li, Allen LiuSTOC 2024 · 被引用 9 次
- Learning Distributions over Quantum Measurement OutcomesWeiyuan Gong, Scott AaronsonICML 2023 · 被引用 13 次
- Triply efficient shadow tomographyRobbie King, David Gosset, Robin Kothari, Ryan BabbushSODA 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- The Debiased Keyl's Algorithm: A New Unbiased Estimator for Full State TomographyAngelos Pelecanos, Jack Spilecki, John WrightSTOC 2026 · 被引用 22 次
- Learning the Closest Product StateAinesh Bakshi, John Bostanci, William Kretschmer, Zeph Landau 等STOC 2025 · 被引用 1 次
