Pencil: Private and Extensible Collaborative Learning without the Non-Colluding Assumption
Xuanqi Liu, Zhuotao Liu, Qi Li, Ke Xu, Mingwei Xu
摘要
The escalating focus on data privacy poses significant challenges for collaborative neural network training, where data ownership and model training/deployment responsibilities reside with distinct entities. Our community has made substantial contributions to addressing this challenge, proposing various approaches such as federated learning (FL) and privacy-preserving machine learning based on cryptographic constructs like homomorphic encryption (HE) and secure multiparty computation (MPC). However, FL completely overlooks model privacy, and HE has limited extensibility (confined to only one data provider). While the state-of-the-art MPC frameworks provide reasonable throughput and simultaneously ensure model/data privacy, they rely on a critical non-colluding assumption on the computing servers, and relaxing this assumption is still an open problem. In this paper, we present Pencil, the first private training framework for collaborative learning that simultaneously offers data privacy, model privacy, and extensibility to multiple data providers, without relying on the non-colluding assumption. Our fundamental design principle is to construct the n-party collaborative training protocol based on an efficient two-party protocol, and meanwhile ensuring that switching to different data providers during model training introduces no extra cost. We introduce several novel cryptographic protocols to realize this design principle and conduct a rigorous security and privacy analysis. Our comprehensive evaluations of Pencil demonstrate that (i) models trained in plaintext and models trained privately using Pencil exhibit nearly identical test accuracies; (ii) The training overhead of Pencil is greatly reduced: Pencil achieves 10 ∼ 260× higher throughput and 2 orders of magnitude less communication than prior art; (iii) Pencil is resilient against both existing and adaptive (white-box) attacks.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper26
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 7,620 次
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 被引用 5,137 次
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone 等CCS 2017 · 被引用 3,936 次
- SecureML: A System for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningPayman Mohassel, Yupeng ZhangS&P 2017 · 被引用 2,107 次
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter 等USENIX Security 2016 · 被引用 2,088 次
相关 Paper
- A Scalable Approach for Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Machine LearningJinhyun So, Basak Güler, Salman AvestimehrNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 60 次
- HEPrune: Fast Private Training of Deep Neural Networks With Encrypted Data PruningYancheng Zhang, Mengxin Zheng, Yuzhang Shang, Xun Chen 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 23 次
- POSEIDON: Privacy-Preserving Federated Neural Network LearningSinem Sav, Apostolos Pyrgelis, Juan Ramón Troncoso-Pastoriza, David Froelicher 等NDSS 2021
- CaPC Learning: Confidential and Private Collaborative LearningChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Natalie Dullerud, Adam Dziedzic, Yunxiang Zhang 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 24 次
- Revisiting ML Training under Fully Homomorphic Encryption: Convergence Guarantees, Differential Privacy, and Efficient AlgorithmsYvonne Zhou, Mingyu Liang, Ivan Brugere, Danial Dervovic 等ICML 2026
