Plan-Answer-Refine-on-Graph: Structured Planning and Self-Refinement for Large Language Model Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs
Yuxin Shi, Han Fu, Zhuo Li, Chenghao Liu, Xiaoxue Ren, Jianling Sun
摘要
Incorporating knowledge graphs (KGs) into large language model (LLM) reasoning has shown promise in alleviating hallucinations and factual errors. Although existing paradigms of KG-augmented LLMs have achieved encouraging results, they still exhibit notable limitations when handling multi-hop reasoning and complex logical queries: (1) search space truncation bias: current methods generate linear entity-relation reasoning paths, which can prune correct candidates prematurely during iterative exploration; and (2) entity error amplification: existing methods typically follow the retrieve-and-answer paradigm which causes LLMs to over-rely on retrieved evidence, exacerbating the impact of incorrect entities during reasoning. To alleviate the existing challenges, we propose Plan-Answer-Refine-on-Graph (PARoG), a novel framework for LLM reasoning on knowledge graphs. First, PARoG leverages SPARQL queries from KG data as references, decomposing them into structured step-by-step plans. We further train LLMs to construct such structured plans, which improves the logical consistency of reasoning, ensures uniform step granularity, and facilitates effective execution on the graph. Second, during reasoning over KGs, PARoG adopts a plan-answer-refine paradigm: the model first attempts to answer each sub-query independently, and then refines its prediction by integrating evidence retrieved from the KG. This process mitigates knowledge conflicts between LLM and KG, substantially reducing hallucinations. Experimental results on multiple KG reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that PARoG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, achieving especially superior accuracy on multi-hop and logically complex queries. Our code is available at https://github.com/shiyuxin2000/PARoG
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper35
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat 等ICML 2020 · 被引用 2,937 次
- Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning YetJie Huang, Xinyun Chen, Swaroop Mishra, Huaixiu Steven Zheng 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 858 次
相关 Paper
- Plan-on-Graph: Self-Correcting Adaptive Planning of Large Language Model on Knowledge GraphsLiyi Chen, Panrong Tong, Zhongming Jin, Ying Sun 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 160 次
- Paths-over-Graph: Knowledge Graph Empowered Large Language Model ReasoningXingyu Tan, Xiaoyang Wang, Qing Liu, Xiwei Xu 等WWW 2025 · 被引用 86 次
- ProgRAG: Hallucination-Resistant Progressive Retrieval and Reasoning over Knowledge GraphsMinbae Park, Hyemin Yang, Jeonghyun Kim, Kunsoo Park 等AAAI 2026
- VoG: Enhancing LLM Reasoning through Stepwise Verification on Knowledge GraphsWenxin Zhao, Jiachuan Wang, Yongqi Zhang, Shuangyin Li 等ICLR 2026
- Reasoning on Graphs: Faithful and Interpretable Large Language Model ReasoningLinhao Luo, Yuan-Fang Li, Gholamreza Haffari, Shirui PanICLR 2024 · 被引用 499 次
