Learning Dynamics of LLM Finetuning
Yi Ren, Danica J. Sutherland
摘要
Learning dynamics, which describes how the learning of specific training examples influences the model's predictions on other examples, gives us a powerful tool for understanding the behavior of deep learning systems. We study the learning dynamics of large language models during different types of finetuning, by analyzing the step-wise decomposition of how influence accumulates among different potential responses. Our framework allows a uniform interpretation of many interesting observations about the training of popular algorithms for both instruction tuning and preference tuning. In particular, we propose a hypothetical explanation of why specific types of hallucination are strengthened after finetuning, e.g., the model might use phrases or facts in the response for question B to answer question A, or the model might keep repeating similar simple phrases when generating responses. We also extend our framework and highlight a unique "squeezing effect" to explain a previously observed phenomenon in off-policy direct preference optimization (DPO), where running DPO for too long makes even the desired outputs less likely. This framework also provides insights into where the benefits of on-policy DPO and other variants come from. The analysis not only provides a novel perspective of understanding LLM's finetuning but also inspires a simple, effective method to improve alignment performance. Code for experiments is available at https://github.com/Joshua-Ren/Learning_dynamics_LLM .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper57
- Do Not Let Low-Probability Tokens Over-Dominate in RL for LLMsZhihe Yang, Xufang Luo, Zilong Wang, Dongqi Han 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 47 次
- Tracing the Representation Geometry of Language Models from Pretraining to Post-trainingMelody Zixuan Li, Kumar Krishna Agrawal, Arna Ghosh, Komal Kumar Teru 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 38 次
- On the Effect of Negative Gradient in Group Relative Deep Reinforcement OptimizationWenlong Deng, Yi Ren, Muchen Li, Danica J. Sutherland 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 36 次
- Implicit Reward as the Bridge: A Unified View of SFT and DPO ConnectionsBo Wang, Qinyuan Cheng, Runyu Peng, Rong Bao 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 23 次
- Bias Amplification in Language Model Evolution: An Iterated Learning PerspectiveYi Ren, Shangmin Guo, Linlu Qiu, Bailin Wang 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 23 次
它引用的顶会 Paper26
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 4,112 次
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 1,822 次
- Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-DistributionAnanya Kumar, Aditi Raghunathan, Robbie Matthew Jones, Tengyu Ma 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 911 次
相关 Paper
- FLAME : Factuality-Aware Alignment for Large Language ModelsSheng-Chieh Lin, Luyu Gao, Barlas Oguz, Wenhan Xiong 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 63 次
- Measuring memorization in RLHF for code completionJamie Hayes, Ilia Shumailov, William P. Porter, Aneesh PappuICLR 2025
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 13 次
- Is On-Policy Data always the Best Choice for Direct Preference Optimization-Based LM Alignment?Zetian Sun, Dongfang Li, Xuhui Chen, Baotian Hu 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 119 次
