Conformal Prediction Beyond the Seen: A Missing Mass Perspective for Uncertainty Quantification in Generative Models
Sima Noorani, Shayan Kiyani, George J. Pappas, Hamed Hassani
摘要
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for safe deployment of generative AI models such as large language models (LLMs), especially in high-stakes applications. Conformal prediction (CP) offers a principled uncertainty quantification framework, but classical methods focus on regression and classification, relying on geometric distances or softmax scores-tools that presuppose structured outputs. We depart from this paradigm by studying CP in a query-only setting, where prediction sets must be constructed solely from finite queries to a black-box generative model, introducing a new trade-off between coverage, test-time query budget, and informativeness. We introduce Conformal Prediction with Query Oracle (CPQ), a framework characterizing the optimal interplay between these objectives. Our finite-sample algorithm is built on two core principles: one governs the optimal query policy, and the other defines the optimal mapping from queried samples to prediction sets. Remarkably, both are rooted in the classical missing mass problem in statistics. Specifically, the optimal query policy depends on the rate of decay-or the derivative-of the missing mass, for which we develop a novel estimator. Meanwhile, the optimal mapping hinges on the missing mass itself, which we estimate using Good-Turing estimators. We then turn our focus to implementing our method for language models, particularly in open-ended LLM tasks involving question answering, multi-step reasoning, and structured information extraction, where outputs are vast, variable, and often under-specified. Fine-grained experiments 2 on three real-world open-ended tasks and two LLMs, show CPQ's applicability to any black-box LLM and highlight: (1) individual contribution of each principle to CPQ's performance, and (2) CPQ's ability to yield significantly more informative prediction sets than existing conformal methods for language uncertainty quantification.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Human-AI Collaborative Uncertainty QuantificationSima Noorani, Shayan Kiyani, George Pappas, Hamed HassaniICML 2026 · 被引用 8 次
- Multi-Round Human–AI Collaboration with User-Specified RequirementsSima Noorani, Shayan Kiyani, Hamed Hassani, George PappasICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Conformal Risk-Averse Decision Making with Action Conditional GuaranteeZihan Zhu, Shayan Kiyani, George Pappas, Hamed HassaniICML 2026 · 被引用 1 次
它引用的顶会 Paper16
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 681 次
- Classification with Valid and Adaptive CoverageYaniv Romano, Matteo Sesia, Emmanuel J. CandèsNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 586 次
- SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language ModelsPotsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, Mark J. F. GalesEMNLP 2023 · 被引用 331 次
- Conformal Language ModelingVictor Quach, Adam Fisch, Tal Schuster, Adam Yala 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 132 次
- Learning Optimal Conformal ClassifiersDavid Stutz, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Ali Taylan Cemgil, Arnaud DoucetICLR 2022 · 被引用 123 次
相关 Paper
- Language Models with Conformal Factuality GuaranteesChristopher Mohri, Tatsunori HashimotoICML 2024 · 被引用 107 次
- Conf-Gen: Conformal Uncertainty Quantification for Generative ModelsGabriel Loaiza-Ganem, Kevin Zhang, Wei Cui, Marc Law 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Prune 'n Predict: Optimizing LLM Decision-making with Conformal PredictionHarit Vishwakarma, Alan Mishler, Thomas Cook, Niccolò Dalmasso 等ICML 2025
- Domain-Shift-Aware Conformal Prediction for Large Language ModelsZhexiao Lin, Yuanyuan Li, Neeraj Sarna, Yuanyuan Gao 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 6 次
- Conditional Factuality Controlled LLMs with Generalization Certificates via Conformal SamplingKai Ye, Qingtao Pan, Shuo LiCVPR 2026 · 被引用 1 次
