Task-Specific Data Selection for Instruction Tuning via Monosemantic Neuronal Activations
Da Ma, Gonghu Shang, Zhi Chen, Libo Qin, Yijie Luo, Hongshen Xu, Lei Pan, Shuai Fan, Kai Yu, Lu Chen
摘要
Instruction tuning improves the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow diverse human instructions, but achieving strong performance on specific target tasks remains challenging. A critical bottleneck is selecting the most relevant data to maximize task-specific performance. Existing data selection approaches include unstable influence-based methods and more stable distribution alignment methods, the latter of which critically rely on the underlying sample representation. In practice, most distribution alignment methods, from shallow features (e.g., BM25) to neural embeddings (e.g., BGE, LLM2Vec), may fail to capture how the model internally processes samples. To bridge this gap, we adopt a model-centric strategy in which each sample is represented by its neuronal activation pattern in the model, directly reflecting internal computation. However, directly using raw neuron activations leads to spurious similarity between unrelated samples due to neuron polysemanticity, where a single neuron may respond to multiple, unrelated concepts. To address this, we employ sparse autoencoders to disentangle polysemantic activations into sparse, monosemantic representations, and introduce a dedicated similarity metric for this space to better identify task-relevant data. Comprehensive experiments across multiple instruction datasets, models, tasks, and selection ratios show that our approach consistently outperforms existing data selection baselines in both stability and task-specific performance 2 .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- TRACE: Trajectory-based Activation Change Estimation for Task-specific Data SelectionYe He, Shangzhan Li, Yuxin Zhou, Qi ShiAAAI 2026
- Matched Data, Better Models: Target Aligned Data Filtering with Sparse AutoencodersArnav Das, Gantavya Bhatt, Sahil Verma, Yiping Wang 等ICLR 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper22
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 7,905 次
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 1,486 次
相关 Paper
- Task-Aware Data Selection via Proxy-Label Enhanced Distribution Matching for LLM FinetuningHao Cheng, Rui Zhang, Ling Li, Na Di 等ICLR 2026
- A Critical Look at Targeted Instruction Selection: Disentangling What Matters (and What Doesn’t)Nihal Nayak, Paula Rodriguez-Diaz, Neha Hulkund, Sara Beery 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Finding the Translation Switch: Discovering and Exploiting the Task-Initiation Features in LLMsXinwei Wu, Heng Liu, Xiaohu Zhao, Yuqi Ren 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Neuron-Aware Data Selection in Instruction Tuning for Large Language ModelsXin Chen, Junchao Wu, Shu Yang, Runzhe Zhan 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Wasserstein Distances, Neuronal Entanglement, and SparsityShashata Sawmya, Linghao Kong, Ilia Markov, Dan Alistarh 等ICLR 2025
