MoDitector: Module-Directed Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems
Renzhi Wang, Mingfei Cheng, Xiaofei Xie, Yuan Zhou, Lei Ma
摘要
Testing Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs) is crucial for ensuring their safety, reliability, and performance. Despite numerous testing methods available that can generate diverse and challenging scenarios to uncover potential vulnerabilities, these methods often treat ADS as a black-box, primarily focusing on identifying system-level failures like collisions or near-misses without pinpointing the specific modules responsible for these failures. This lack of root causes understanding for the failures hinders effective debugging and subsequent system repair. Furthermore, current approaches often fall short in generating violations that adequately test the individual modules of an ADS from a system-level perspective, such as perception, prediction, planning, and control. To bridge this gap, we introduce MoDitector, a root-cause-aware testing method for ADS that generates safety-critical scenarios specifically designed to expose weaknesses in targeted ADS modules. Unlike existing approaches, MoDitector not only produces scenarios that lead to violations but also pinpoints the specific module responsible for each failure. Specifically, our approach introduces Module-Specific Oracles to automatically detect module-level errors and identify the root-cause module responsible for system-level violations. To effectively generate module-specific failures, we propose a module-directed testing strategy that integrates Module-Specific Feedback and Adaptive Scenario Generation to guide the testing process. We evaluated MoDitector across four critical ADS modules and four representative testing scenarios. The results demonstrate that MoDitector can effectively and efficiently generate scenarios in which failures can be attributed to specific targeted modules. In total, MoDitector generated 216.7 expected scenarios, significantly outperforming the best baseline, which identified only 79.0 scenarios. Our approach represents a significant innovation in ADS testing by focusing on the identification and rectification of module-specific errors within the system, moving beyond conventional black-box failure detection.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper16
- Misbehaviour prediction for autonomous driving systemsAndrea Stocco, Michael Weiss, Marco Calzana, Paolo TonellaICSE 2020 · 被引用 138 次
- On Adversarial Robustness of Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous VehiclesQingzhao Zhang, Shengtuo Hu, Jiachen Sun, Qi Alfred Chen 等CVPR 2022 · 被引用 132 次
- Testing of autonomous driving systems: where are we and where should we go?Guannan Lou, Yao Deng, Xi Zheng, Mengshi Zhang 等FSE 2022 · 被引用 85 次
- Efficient Online Testing for DNN-Enabled Systems using Surrogate-Assisted and Many-Objective OptimizationFitash Ul Haq, Donghwan Shin, Lionel C. BriandICSE 2022 · 被引用 77 次
- BehAVExplor: Behavior Diversity Guided Testing for Autonomous Driving SystemsMingfei Cheng, Yuan Zhou, Xiaofei XieISSTA 2023 · 被引用 59 次
相关 Paper
- Poirot: Automatic Root Cause Analysis of Safety Violations in ADS Simulation Testing via Hypothetical ReasoningYou Lu, Dingji Wang, Kun Zhang, Bihuan Chen 等ISSTA 2026
- MOSAT: finding safety violations of autonomous driving systems using multi-objective genetic algorithmHaoxiang Tian, Yan Jiang, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan 等FSE 2022 · 被引用 74 次
- DeFT: Maintaining Determinism and Extracting Unit Tests for Autonomous Driving PlanningYuqi Huai, Yuntianyi Chen, Ziwen Wan, Qi Alfred Chen 等ICSE 2026
- Testing the Fault-Tolerance of Multi-sensor Fusion Perception in Autonomous Driving SystemsHaoxiang Tian, Wenqiang Ding, Xingshuo Han, Guoquan Wu 等ISSTA 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Generating Realistic and Diverse Tests for LiDAR-Based Perception SystemsGarrett Christian, Trey Woodlief, Sebastian G. ElbaumICSE 2023 · 被引用 11 次
