The Sample Complexity of Best-k Items Selection from Pairwise Comparisons
Wenbo Ren, Jia Liu, Ness B. Shroff
摘要
This paper studies the sample complexity (aka number of comparisons) bounds for the active best-k items selection from pairwise comparisons. From a given set of items, the learner can make pairwise comparisons on every pair of items, and each comparison returns an independent noisy result about the preferred item. At any time, the learner can adaptively choose a pair of items to compare according to past observations (i.e., active learning). The learner's goal is to find the (approximately) best-k items with a given confidence, while trying to use as few comparisons as possible. In this paper, we study two problems: (i) finding the probably approximately correct (PAC) best-k items and (ii) finding the exact best-k items, both under strong stochastic transitivity and stochastic triangle inequality. For PAC best-k items selection, we first show a lower bound and then propose an algorithm whose sample complexity upper bound matches the lower bound up to a constant factor. For the exact best-k items selection, we first prove a worst-instance lower bound. We then propose two algorithms based on our PAC best items selection algorithms: one works for k = 1 and is sample complexity optimal up to a loglog factor, and the other works for all values of k and is sample complexity optimal up to a log factor. The second problem is the exact best-k items selection. Under SST, since there is a strict order over these n items, the best-k items are unique. The best-k items are r 1 , r 2 , ..., r k , and finding the best-k items is to find the set r 1 , r 2 , ..., r k . We do not need to order these best-k items but only need to
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper6
- Identification of the Generalized Condorcet Winner in Multi-dueling BanditsBjörn Haddenhorst, Viktor Bengs, Eyke HüllermeierNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 14 次
- Finding Optimal Arms in Non-stochastic Combinatorial Bandits with Semi-bandit Feedback and Finite BudgetJasmin Brandt, Viktor Bengs, Björn Haddenhorst, Eyke HüllermeierNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 9 次
- Sample Complexity Bounds for Active Ranking from Multi-wise ComparisonsWenbo Ren, Jia Liu, Ness B. ShroffNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 5 次
- Dueling Bandits with Team ComparisonsLee Cohen, Ulrike Schmidt-Kraepelin, Yishay MansourNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 1 次
- Achieving Nearly-Optimal Regret and Sample Complexity in Dueling Bandits with Applications in Online RecommendationsLanjihong Ma, Yao-Xiang Ding, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Zhi-Hua ZhouKDD 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- Active Ranking without Strong Stochastic TransitivityHao Lou, Tao Jin, Yue Wu, Pan Xu 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 11 次
- Optimal Top- Identification from Pairwise ComparisonsMotti Goldberger, Nils RudiICML 2026
- Ranking with Multiple Oracles: From Weak to Strong Stochastic TransitivityTao Jin, Yue Wu, Quanquan Gu, Farzad FarnoudICML 2025
- Active Ranking and Matchmaking, with Perfect MatchingsHafedh El Ferchichi, Matthieu Lerasle, Vianney PerchetICML 2024 · 被引用 2 次
- Active preference learning for ordering items in- and out-of-sampleHerman Bergström, Emil Carlsson, Devdatt P. Dubhashi, Fredrik D. JohanssonNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 9 次
