Correcting the Mythos of KL-Regularization: Direct Alignment without Overoptimization via Chi-Squared Preference Optimization
Audrey Huang, Wenhao Zhan, Tengyang Xie, Jason D. Lee, Wen Sun, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Dylan J. Foster
摘要
Language model alignment methods such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) have led to impressive advances in language model capabilities, but are limited by a widely observed phenomenon known as overoptimization, where the quality of the language model degrades over the course of the alignment process. As the model optimizes performance with respect to an offline reward model, it overfits to inaccuracies and drifts away from preferred responses covered by the data. To discourage such distribution shift, KL-regularization is widely employed in existing offline alignment methods, but overoptimization continues to harm performance. Lending theoretical insight into the source of these empirical observations, we first show that the KL-regularization is too weak to prevent overfitting, then raise the following question: is it possible to design an efficient algorithm that is provably robust to overoptimization? We address this question with a new algorithm for offline alignment, χ 2 -Preference Optimization (χPO). χPO is a one-line change to Direct Preference Optimization (DPO; Rafailov et al. ( 2023 )), which only involves modifying the logarithmic link function in the DPO objective. Despite this minimal change, χPO implicitly implements the principle of pessimism in the face of uncertainty via regularization with the χ 2 -divergence-which quantifies uncertainty more effectively than KL-regularization-and provably alleviates overoptimization, achieving sample-complexity guarantees based on single-policy concentrability-the gold standard in offline reinforcement learning. χPO's simplicity and strong guarantees make it the first practical and general-purpose offline alignment algorithm that is provably robust to overoptimization.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper32
- Normalized Rewards for Preference OptimizationShawn Im, Federico Danieli, Skyler Seto, Barry-John Theobald 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 571 次
- All Roads Lead to Likelihood: The Value of Reinforcement Learning in Fine-TuningGokul Swamy, Sanjiban Choudhury, Wen Sun, Steven Wu 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 66 次
- Inference-Time Reward Hacking in Large Language ModelsHadi Khalaf, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, Alex Oesterling, Himabindu Lakkaraju 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 38 次
- Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage RegressionKianté Brantley, Mingyu Chen, Zhaolin Gao, Jason D. Lee 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 31 次
- Distortion of AI Alignment: Does Preference Optimization Optimize for Preferences?Paul Gölz, Nika Haghtalab, Kunhe YangNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 29 次
它引用的顶会 Paper44
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 1,822 次
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 被引用 963 次
相关 Paper
- Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHFTengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Corby Rosset 等ICLR 2025
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 346 次
- Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline AlignmentYunhao Tang, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Zeyu Zheng, Daniele Calandriello 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 159 次
- Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHFShicong Cen, Jincheng Mei, Katayoon Goshvadi, Hanjun Dai 等ICLR 2025
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 119 次
