Panini: Continual Learning in Token Space via Structured Memory
Shreyas Rajesh, Pavan Holur, Mehmet Yigit Turali, Chenda Duan, Vwani Roychowdhury
摘要
Language models are increasingly used to reason over content they were not trained on, such as new documents, evolving knowledge, and user-specific data. A common approach is retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which stores verbatim documents externally (as chunks) and retrieves only a relevant subset at inference time for an LLM to reason over. However, this results in inefficient usage of test-time compute (LLM repeatedly reasons over the same documents); moreover, chunk retrieval can inject irrelevant context that increases unsupported generation. We propose a human-like non-parametric continual learning framework, where the base model remains fixed, and learning occurs by integrating each new experience into an external semantic memory state that accumulates and consolidates itself continually. We present PANINI, which realizes this by representing documents as Generative Semantic Workspaces (GSW)—an entity- and event-aware network of question–answer (QA) pairs, sufficient for an LLM to reconstruct the experienced situations and mine latent knowledge via reasoning-grounded inference chains on the network. Given a query, PANINI only traverses the continually-updated GSW (not the verbatim documents or chunks), and retrieves the most likely inference chains. Across six QA benchmarks, PANINI achieves the highest average performance, 5%–7% higher than other competitive baselines, while using 2–30× fewer answer-context tokens, supports fully open-source pipelines, and reduces unsupported answers on curated unanswerable queries. The results show that efficient and accurate structuring of experiences at write time—as achieved by the GSW framework—yields both efficiency and reliability gains at read time. Code is available at https://github.com/roychowdhuryresearch/gsw-memory.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper24
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 19,162 次
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 3,415 次
- Tent: Fully Test-Time Adaptation by Entropy MinimizationDequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu, Bruno A. Olshausen 等ICLR 2021 · 被引用 1,731 次
相关 Paper
- From RAG to Memory: Non-Parametric Continual Learning for Large Language ModelsBernal Jiménez Gutiérrez, Yiheng Shu, Weijian Qi, Sizhe Zhou 等ICML 2025
- SegMem-RAG: Adaptive Memory for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Open-Ended Knowledge EnvironmentsXuanbo Fan, Tianqi Zhao, Yi Cheng, Chi Xiu 等AAAI 2026
- GAM-RAG: Gain-Adaptive Memory for Evolving Retrieval in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationYifan Wang, Mingxuan Jiang, Zhihao Sun, Yixin Cao 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Beyond Fact Retrieval: Episodic Memory for RAG with Generative Semantic WorkspacesShreyas Rajesh, Pavan Holur, Chenda Duan, David Chong 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- FlowRAG: Continual Learning for Dynamic Retriever in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationSenlei Zhang, Tongjun Shi, Dandan Song, Luan Zhang 等WWW 2026
