Quadratic Coreset Selection: Certifying and Reconciling Sequence and Token Mining for Efficient Instruction Tuning
Ziliang Chen, Yongsen Zheng, Zhao-Rong Lai, Zhanfu Yang, Cuixi Li, Yang Liu, Liang Lin
摘要
Instruction-Tuning (IT) was recently found the impressive data efficiency in post-training large language models (LLMs). While the pursuit of efficiency predominantly focuses on sequence-level curation, often overlooking the nuanced impact of critical tokens and the inherent risks of token noise and biases. Drawing inspiration from bi-level coreset selection, our work provides the principled view of the motivation behind selecting instructions’ responses. It leads to our approach Quadratic Coreset Selection (QCS) that reconciles sequence-level and token-level influence contributions, deriving more expressive LLMs with established theoretical result. Despite the original QCS framework challenged by prohibitive computation from inverted LLM-scale Hessian matrices, we overcome this barrier by proposing a novel QCS probabilistic variant, which relaxes the original formulation through re-parameterized densities. This innovative solver is efficiently learned using hierarchical policy gradients without requiring back-propagation, achieving provable convergence and certified asymptotic equivalence to the original objective. Our experiments demonstrate QCS’s superior sequence-level data efficiency and reveal how strategically leveraging token-level influence elevates the performance ceiling of data-efficient IT. Furthermore, QCS’s adaptability is showcased through its successes in regular IT and challenging targeted IT scenarios, particularly in the cases of free-form complex instruction-following and CoT reasoning. They underscore QCS’s potential for a wide array of versatile post-training applications.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper31
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 18,833 次
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 4,966 次
相关 Paper
- BRIEF: Bi-level Coreset Selection for Efficient Instruction Tuning in LLMsChaoyuan Shen, Chi Zhang, Chengliang Chai, Jiacheng Wang 等VLDB 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Can Reasoning Path still be Effective as Input? Bridging Post-Reasoning to Chain-of-Thought CompressionChengzhengxu Li, Xiaoming Liu, Zhaohan Zhang, Shengchao Liu 等ACL 2026
- Upcycling Instruction Tuning from Dense to Mixture-of-Experts via Parameter MergingTingfeng Hui, Zhenyu Zhang, Shuohuan Wang, Yu Sun 等ACL 2025
- LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 460 次
- Improving Conversational Abilities of Quantized Large Language Models via Direct Preference AlignmentJanghwan Lee, Seongmin Park, Sukjin Hong, Minsoo Kim 等ACL 2024 · 被引用 2 次
