Capturing Semantics for Imputation with Pre-trained Language Models
Yinan Mei, Shaoxu Song, Chenguang Fang, Haifeng Yang, Jingyun Fang, Jiang Long
摘要
Existing imputation methods generally generate several possible fillings as candidates and determine the value from the candidates for imputing. However, semantics are ignored in these methods. Recently, pre-trained language models achieve good performances in various language understanding tasks. Motivated by this, we propose IPM that captures semantics for Imputation with Pre-trained language Models. A straightforward idea is to model the imputation task as a multiclass classfication task, named IPM-Multi. IPM-Multi predicts the missing values by fine-tuning the pre-trained model. Due to the low redundancy of databases and large domain sizes, IPM-Multi may suffer the over-fitting problem. In this case, we develop another approach named IPM-Binary. IPM-Binary first generates a set of uncertain candidates and fine-tunes a pre-trained language model to select candidates. Specifically, IPM-Binary models the candidate selection task as a binary classification problem. Unlike IPM-Multi, IPM-Binary computes the probability for each candidate filling respectively, by accepting both complete attributes and a candidate filling as input. The attention mechanism enhances the ability of IPM-Binary to capture semantic information. Moreover, negative sampling from neighbors rather than domains is employed to accelerate the training process and makes the training more targeted and effective. As a result, IPM-Binary requires fewer data to converge. We compare our proposal IPM to the state-of-the-art baselines on multiple datasets. And the extensive experimental results show that IPM outperforms existing solutions. The evaluation of IPM validates our intuitions and demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed optimizations.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper9
- Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?Avanika Narayan, Ines Chami, Laurel J. Orr, Christopher RéVLDB 2023 · 被引用 325 次
- Is In-Context Learning in Large Language Models Bayesian? A Martingale PerspectiveFabian Falck, Ziyu Wang, Christopher C. HolmesICML 2024 · 被引用 46 次
- On LLM-Enhanced Mixed-Type Data Imputation with High-Order Message PassingJianmin Wang, Kai Wang, Ying Zhang, Wenjie Zhang 等VLDB 2025 · 被引用 15 次
- Unveiling Challenges for LLMs in Enterprise Data EngineeringJan-Micha Bodensohn, Ulf Brackmann, Liane Vogel, Anupam Sanghi 等VLDB 2026 · 被引用 13 次
- Jellyfish: Instruction-Tuning Local Large Language Models for Data PreprocessingHaochen Zhang, Yuyang Dong, Chuan Xiao, Masafumi OyamadaEMNLP 2024 · 被引用 11 次
它引用的顶会 Paper3
- Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language ModelsYuliang Li, Jinfeng Li, Yoshihiko Suhara, AnHai Doan 等VLDB 2021 · 被引用 484 次
- Creating Embeddings of Heterogeneous Relational Datasets for Data Integration TasksRiccardo Cappuzzo, Paolo Papotti, Saravanan ThirumuruganathanSIGMOD 2020 · 被引用 139 次
- Imputing Various Incomplete Attributes via Distance Likelihood MaximizationShaoxu Song, Yu SunKDD 2020 · 被引用 15 次
相关 Paper
- EXOTIC: External Vision-driven Incomplete Multi-view ClassificationShilin Xu, Dezhong Peng, Zhenwen Ren, Yuan SunCVPR 2026
- Characterizing the Predictive Impact of Modalities with Supervised Latent-Variable ModelingDivyam Madaan, Sumit Chopra, Kyunghyun ChoICML 2026
- Rare Words: A Major Problem for Contextualized Embeddings and How to Fix it by Attentive MimickingTimo Schick, Hinrich SchützeAAAI 2020 · 被引用 106 次
- Zero-Shot Slot Filling with Slot-Prefix Prompting and Attention Relationship DescriptorQiaoyang Luo, Lingqiao LiuAAAI 2023 · 被引用 10 次
- Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Mask-adapted CLIPFeng Liang, Bichen Wu, Xiaoliang Dai, Kunpeng Li 等CVPR 2023
