Lune

ICLR2025顶会

Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment

Alexey Gorbatovski, Boris Shaposhnikov, Alexey Malakhov, Nikita Surnachev, Yaroslav Aksenov, Ian Maksimov, Nikita Balagansky, Daniil Gavrilov

问 Lune

摘要

Despite the fact that offline methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment do not require a direct reward model, they remain susceptible to overoptimization. This issue arises when the trained model deviates excessively from the reference policy, leading to a decrease in sample quality. We propose a novel approach of offline alignment methods, called Trust Region (including variants TR-DPO, TR-IPO, TR-KTO), which dynamically updates the reference policy throughout the training process. Our results show that TR alignment methods effectively mitigate overoptimization, enabling models to maintain strong performance even when substantially deviating from the initial reference policy. We demonstrate the efficacy of these approaches not only through toy examples that exhibit reduced overoptimization, but also through direct, side-by-side comparisons in specific tasks such as helpful and harmless dialogue, as well as summarization, where they surpass conventional methods. Additionally, we report significant improvements in general-purpose assistant setups with the Llama3 model on the AlpacaEval 2 and Arena-Hard benchmarks, highlighting the advantages of Trust Region methods over classical approaches.

问 Lune

尽管问,回答会引用原文。

Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。

可以从这些问题问起

Lune 的依据

全文 · 引用它的 24 篇顶会 Paper · 相关的 Paper

获取答案

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper24

  1. Mix Data or Merge Models? Balancing the Helpfulness, Honesty, and Harmlessness of Large Language Model via Model MergingJinluan Yang, Dingnan Jin, Anke Tang, Li Shen 等NeurIPS 2025 · 23 次引用
  2. Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language ModelsErhan Xu, Kai Ye, Hongyi Zhou, Luhan Zhu 等NeurIPS 2025 · 14 次引用
  3. Reinforcement Learning Teachers of Test Time ScalingEdoardo Cetin, Tianyu Zhao, Yujin TangNeurIPS 2025 · 12 次引用
  4. Uni-DPO: A Unified Paradigm for Dynamic Preference Optimization of LLMsShangpin Peng, Weinong Wang, Zhuotao Tian, Senqiao Yang 等ICLR 2026 · 10 次引用
  5. Merging on the Fly Without Retraining: A Sequential Approach to Scalable Continual Model MergingAnke Tang, Enneng Yang, Li Shen, Yong Luo 等NeurIPS 2025 · 8 次引用

它引用的 Paper22

  1. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 次引用
  2. Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 次引用
  3. Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou 等ICLR 2021 · 7,905 次引用
  4. WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 次引用
  5. PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao 等AAAI 2020 · 2,916 次引用

相关 Paper

  1. AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference OptimizationJunkang Wu, Xue Wang, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu 等ICML 2025
  2. Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language ModelsSomanshu Singla, Zhen Wang, Tianyang Liu, Abdullah Ashfaq 等EMNLP 2024 · 1 次引用
  3. LLM Alignment as Retriever Optimization: An Information Retrieval PerspectiveBowen Jin, Jinsung Yoon, Zhen Qin, Ziqi Wang 等ICML 2025
  4. Normalized Rewards for Preference OptimizationShawn Im, Federico Danieli, Skyler Seto, Barry-John Theobald 等ICML 2026 · 571 次引用
  5. Keep the Best, Forget the Rest: Reliable Alignment with Order-Aware Preference OptimizationJiahui Zhu, Yuanjie Shi, Xiyue Peng, Xin Liu 等ICLR 2026
黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖