Packing LPs are Hard to Solve Accurately, Assuming Linear Equations are Hard
Rasmus Kyng, Di Wang, Peng Zhang
摘要
We study the complexity of approximately solving packing linear programs. In the Real RAM model, it is known how to solve packing LPs with N non-zeros in time Õ(N/ϵ). We investigate whether the ϵ dependence in the running time can be improved. Our first main result relates the difficulty of this problem to hardness assumptions for solving dense linear equations. We show that, in the Real RAM model, unless linear equations in matrices n × n with condition number O(n10) can be solved to ϵ accuracy faster than Õ(n2.01 log(1/ϵ)), no algorithm (1−ϵ)-approximately solves a O(n)×O(n) packing LPs (where N = O(n2)) in time Õ(n2ϵ−0.0003). It would be surprising to solve linear equations in the Real RAM model this fast, as we currently cannot solve them faster than Õ(nω), where ω denotes the exponent in the running time for matrix multiplication in the Real RAM model (and equivalently matrix inversion). The current best bound on this exponent is roughly ω ≤ 2.372. Note, however, that a fast solver for linear equations does not directly imply faster matrix multiplication. But, our reduction shows that if fast and accurate packing LP solvers exist, then either linear equations can be solved much faster than matrix multiplication or the matrix multiplication constant is very close to 2. Instantiating the same reduction with different parameters, we show that unless linear equations in matrices with condition number O(n1.5) can be solved to ϵ accuracy faster than Õ(n2.372 log(1/ϵ)), no algorithm (1 – ϵ)-approximately solves packing LPs in time Õ(n2ϵ−0.067). Thus smaller improvements in the exponent for ϵ in the running time of Packing LP solvers also imply improvements in the current state-of-the-art for solving linear equations. Our second main result relates the difficulty of approximately solving packing linear programs to hardness assumptions for solving sparse linear equations: In the Real RAM model, unless well-conditioned sparse systems of linear equations can be solved faster than Õ((no. non-zeros of matrix) ), no algorithm (1 – ϵ)-approximately solves packing LPs with N non-zeros in time Õ(Nϵ−0.165). This running time of Õ((no. non-zeros of matrix) ) is obtained by the classical Conjugate Gradient algorithm by a standard analysis. Our reduction implies that if sufficiently good packing LP solvers exist, then this long-standing best-known bound on the running time for solving well-conditioned systems of linear equations is sub-optimal1. While we prove results in the Real RAM model, our condition number assumptions ensure that our results can be translated to fixed point arithmetic with (log n)O(1) bits per number.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Solving Sparse Linear Systems Faster than Matrix MultiplicationRichard Peng, Santosh S. VempalaSODA 2021 · 被引用 34 次
- Positive semidefinite programming: mixed, parallel, and width-independentArun Jambulapati, Yin Tat Lee, Jerry Li, Swati Padmanabhan 等STOC 2020 · 被引用 12 次
- Entrywise Approximation for Matrix Inversion and Linear SystemsMehrdad Ghadiri, Hoai-An Nguyen, Junzhao YangSODA 2026 · 被引用 1 次
相关 Paper
- A faster algorithm for solving general LPsShunhua Jiang, Zhao Song, Omri Weinstein, Hengjie ZhangSTOC 2021 · 被引用 31 次
- Revisiting Tardos's Framework for Linear Programming: Faster Exact Solutions using Approximate SolversDaniel Dadush, Bento Natura, László A. VéghFOCS 2020 · 被引用 3 次
- The Bit Complexity of Efficient Continuous OptimizationMehrdad Ghadiri, Richard Peng, Santosh S. VempalaFOCS 2023 · 被引用 5 次
- Hardness of Low Rank Approximation of Entrywise Transformed Matrix ProductsTamás Sarlós, Xingyou Song, David P. Woodruff, Richard ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5 次
- Numerical Linear Algebra in Linear SpaceYiping Liu, Hoai-An Nguyen, Junzhao YangSODA 2026
