FaithCoT-Bench: Benchmarking Instance-Level Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Xu Shen, Song Wang, Zhen Tan, Laura Yao, Xinyu Zhao, Kaidi Xu, Xin Wang, Tianlong Chen
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to improve problem-solving and provide seemingly transparent explanations. However, growing evidence shows that CoT often fail to faithfully represent the underlying reasoning process, raising concerns about their reliability in high-risk applications. Although prior studies have focused on mechanismlevel analyses showing that CoTs can be unfaithful, they leave open the practical challenge of deciding whether a specific trajectory is faithful to the internal reasoning of the model. To address this gap, we introduce FAITHCOT-BENCH, a unified benchmark for instance-level CoT unfaithfulness detection. Our framework establishes a rigorous task formulation that formulates unfaithfulness detection as a discriminative decision problem, and provides FINE-COT (Faithfulness INstance Evaluation for Chain-of-Thought), an expert-annotated collection of over 1,000 trajectories generated by four representative LLMs across four domains, including more than 300 unfaithful instances with fine-grained causes and step-level evidence. We further conduct a systematic evaluation of eleven representative detection methods spanning counterfactual, logit-based, and LLM-asjudge paradigms, deriving empirical insights that clarify the strengths and weaknesses of existing approaches and reveal the increased challenges of detection in knowledge-intensive domains and with more advanced models. To the best of our knowledge, FAITHCOT-BENCH establishes the first comprehensive benchmark for instance-level CoT faithfulness, setting a solid basis for future research toward more interpretable and trustworthy reasoning in LLMs. The code is provide in https://github.com/se7esx/FaithCoT-BENCH .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 1,792 次
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger 等AAAI 2024 · 被引用 1,292 次
- Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical PerspectiveGuhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 470 次
相关 Paper
- M3CoTBench: Benchmark Chain-of-Thought of MLLMs in Medical Image UnderstandingJuntao Jiang, Jiangning Zhang, Yali Bi, Jinsheng Bai 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- CogniBench: A Legal-inspired Framework and Dataset for Assessing Cognitive Faithfulness of Large Language ModelsXiaqiang Tang, Jian Li, Keyu Hu, Nan Du 等ACL 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- DecepChain: Inducing Deceptive Reasoning in Large Language ModelsWei Shen, Han Wang, Haoyu Li, Huan ZhangICML 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- CofCA: A STEP-WISE Counterfactual Multi-hop QA benchmarkJian Wu, Linyi Yang, Zhen Wang, Manabu Okumura 等ICLR 2025
- A Causal Lens for Evaluating Faithfulness MetricsKerem Zaman, Shashank SrivastavaEMNLP 2025
