PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Measurement and Control of Data Processing
Hanshen Xiao, Srinivas Devadas
摘要
We propose and study a new privacy definition, termed Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) Privacy. PAC Privacy characterizes the information-theoretic hardness to recover sensitive data given arbitrary information disclosure/leakage during/after any processing. Unlike the classic cryptographic definition and Differential Privacy (DP), which consider the adversarial (input-independent) worst case, PAC Privacy is a simulatable metric that quantifies the instance-based impossibility of inference. A fully automatic analysis and proof generation framework is proposed: security parameters can be produced with arbitrarily high confidence via Monte-Carlo simulation for any black-box data processing oracle. This appealing automation property enables analysis of complicated data processing, where the worst-case proof in the classic privacy regime could be loose or even intractable. Moreover, we show that the produced PAC Privacy guarantees enjoy simple composition bounds and the automatic analysis framework can be implemented in an online fashion to analyze the composite PAC Privacy loss even under correlated randomness. On the utility side, the magnitude of (necessary) perturbation required in PAC Privacy is not lower bounded by Theta(d) for a d-dimensional release but could be O(1) for many practical data processing tasks, which is in contrast to the input-independent worst-case information-theoretic lower bound. Example applications of PAC Privacy are included with comparisons to existing works.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper9
- Residual-PAC Privacy: Automatic Privacy Control Beyond the Gaussian BarrierTao Zhang, Yevgeniy VorobeychikUSENIX Security 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- Fundamental Limitations of Favorable Privacy–Utility Guarantees for DP-SGDMurat Bilgehan Ertan), Marten van Dijk)CCS 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Formal Privacy Proof of Data Encoding: The Possibility and Impossibility of Learnable EncryptionHanshen Xiao, G. Edward Suh, Srinivas DevadasCCS 2024 · 被引用 2 次
- Trustworthy Machine Learning through Data-Specific IndistinguishabilityHanshen Xiao, Zhen Yang, G. Edward SuhICML 2025
- PAC-Private AlgorithmsMayuri Sridhar, Hanshen Xiao, Srinivas DevadasS&P 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 7,620 次
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 被引用 5,137 次
- CLUB: A Contrastive Log-ratio Upper Bound of Mutual InformationPengyu Cheng, Weituo Hao, Shuyang Dai, Jiachang Liu 等ICML 2020 · 被引用 512 次
- Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine LearningMilad Nasr, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Nicolas Papernot 等S&P 2021 · 被引用 288 次
- Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in L1 GeometryHilal Asi, Vitaly Feldman, Tomer Koren, Kunal TalwarICML 2021 · 被引用 106 次
相关 Paper
- Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information ConstraintPaul Cuff, Lanqing YuCCS 2016 · 被引用 226 次
- Subset-Based Instance Optimality in Private EstimationTravis Dick, Alex Kulesza, Ziteng Sun, Ananda Theertha SureshICML 2023 · 被引用 10 次
- Accuracy-First Rényi Differential Privacy and Post-Processing ImmunityOssi Räisä, Antti Koskela, Antti HonkelaICML 2026
- Statistical Quantification of Differential Privacy: A Local ApproachÖnder Askin, Tim Kutta, Holger DetteS&P 2022 · 被引用 19 次
- Privacy Audit as Bits Transmission: (Im)possibilities for Audit by One RunZihang Xiang, Tianhao Wang, Di WangUSENIX Security 2025
