Out-of-Distribution Generalization on Graphs via Progressive Inference
Yiming Xu, Bin Shi, Zhen Peng, Huixiang Liu, Bo Dong, Chen Chen
摘要
The development and evaluation of graph neural networks (GNNs) generally follow the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) assumption. Yet this assumption is often untenable in practice due to the uncontrollable data generation mechanism. In particular, when the data distribution shows a significant shift, most GNNs would fail to produce reliable predictions and may even make decisions randomly. One of the most promising solutions to improve the model generalization is to pick out causal invariant parts in the input graph. Nonetheless, we observe a significant distribution gap between the causal parts learned by existing methods and the ground-truth, leading to undesirable performance. In response to the above issues, this paper presents GPro, a model that learns graph causal invariance with progressive inference. Specifically, the complicated graph causal invariant learning is decomposed into multiple intermediate inference steps from easy to hard, and the perception of GPro is continuously strengthened through a progressive inference process to extract causal features that are stable to distribution shifts. We also enlarge the training distribution by creating counterfactual samples to enhance the capability of the GPro in capturing the causal invariant parts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed GPro outperforms the state-ofthe-art methods by 4.91% on average. For datasets with more severe distribution shifts, the performance improvement can be up to 6.86%. 1
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper17
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 7,049 次
- Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional NetworksMing Chen, Zhewei Wei, Zengfeng Huang, Bolin Ding 等ICML 2020 · 被引用 1,910 次
- Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 1,632 次
- Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud DetectionYang Liu, Xiang Ao, Zidi Qin, Jianfeng Chi 等WWW 2021 · 被引用 527 次
- A Meta-Transfer Objective for Learning to Disentangle Causal MechanismsYoshua Bengio, Tristan Deleu, Nasim Rahaman, Nan Rosemary Ke 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 371 次
相关 Paper
- Learning Invariant Graph Representations for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationHaoyang Li, Ziwei Zhang, Xin Wang, Wenwu ZhuNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 170 次
- Discovering Invariant Rationales for Graph Neural NetworksYingxin Wu, Xiang Wang, An Zhang, Xiangnan He 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 313 次
- Quantifying Distributional Invariance in Causal Subgraph for IRM-Free Graph GeneralizationYang Qiu, Yixiong Zou, Jun Wang, Wei Liu 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- Size-Invariant Graph Representations for Graph Classification ExtrapolationsBeatrice Bevilacqua, Yangze Zhou, Bruno RibeiroICML 2021 · 被引用 124 次
- Disentangling Invariant Subgraph via Variance Contrastive Estimation under Distribution ShiftsHaoyang Li, Xin Wang, Xueling Zhu, Weigao Wen 等ICML 2025
