Improving Steering and Verification in AI-Assisted Data Analysis with Interactive Task Decomposition
Majeed Kazemitabaar, Jack Williams, Ian Drosos, Tovi Grossman, Austin Zachary Henley, Carina Negreanu, Advait Sarkar
摘要
LLM-powered tools like ChatGPT Data Analysis, have the potential to help users tackle the challenging task of data analysis programming, which requires expertise in data processing, programming, and statistics. However, our formative study (n=15) uncovered serious challenges in verifying AI-generated results and steering the AI (i.e., guiding the AI system to produce the desired output). We developed two contrasting approaches to address these challenges. The first (Stepwise) decomposes the problem into step-by-step subgoals with pairs of editable assumptions and code until task completion, while the second (Phasewise) decomposes the entire problem into three editable, logical phases: structured input/output assumptions, execution plan, and code. A controlled, withinsubjects experiment (n=18) compared these systems against a conversational baseline. Users reported significantly greater control with the Stepwise and Phasewise systems, and found intervention, correction, and verification easier, compared to the baseline. The results suggest design guidelines and trade-offs for AI-assisted data analysis tools.
• Human-centered computing → Natural language interfaces; Interactive systems and tools; Empirical studies in HCI.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper17
- DBox: Scaffolding Algorithmic Programming Learning through Learner-LLM Co-DecompositionShuai Ma, Junling Wang, Yuanhao Zhang, Xiaojuan Ma 等CHI 2025 · 被引用 47 次
- WaitGPT: Monitoring and Steering Conversational LLM Agent in Data Analysis with On-the-Fly Code VisualizationLiwenhan Xie, Chengbo Zheng, Haijun Xia, Huamin Qu 等UIST 2024 · 被引用 45 次
- Beyond Code Generation: LLM-supported Exploration of the Program Design SpaceJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Eunice Jun, Michael Terry, Qian Yang 等CHI 2025 · 被引用 29 次
- Do It For Me vs. Do It With Me: Investigating User Perceptions of Different Paradigms of Automation in Copilots for Feature-Rich SoftwareAnjali Khurana, Xiaotian Su, April Yi Wang, Parmit K. ChilanaCHI 2025 · 被引用 19 次
- ChainBuddy: An AI-assisted Agent System for Generating LLM PipelinesJingyue Zhang, Ian ArawjoCHI 2025 · 被引用 13 次
它引用的顶会 Paper28
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 被引用 892 次
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 被引用 758 次
- Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating ModelsShraddha Barke, Michael B. James, Nadia PolikarpovaOOPSLA 2023 · 被引用 408 次
- How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and ToolsAmy X. Zhang, Michael J. Muller, Dakuo WangCSCW 2020 · 被引用 260 次
相关 Paper
- How Do Analysts Understand and Verify AI-Assisted Data Analyses?Ken Gu, Ruoxi Shang, Tim Althoff, Chenglong Wang 等CHI 2024 · 被引用 36 次
- How Beginning Programmers and Code LLMs (Mis)read Each OtherSydney Nguyen, Hannah McLean Babe, Yangtian Zi, Arjun Guha 等CHI 2024 · 被引用 66 次
- Plan-Then-Execute: An Empirical Study of User Trust and Team Performance When Using LLM Agents As A Daily AssistantGaole He, Gianluca Demartini, Ujwal GadirajuCHI 2025 · 被引用 91 次
- AI-Facilitated Coercive Control: An Experimental StudyHaesoo Kim, Thomas Ristenpart, Nicola DellCHI 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Privacy Control in Conversational LLM Platforms: A Walkthrough StudyZhuoyang Li, Yanlai Wu, Yao Li, Xinning Gui 等CHI 2026 · 被引用 1 次
