Reflection, Education, Consistency: Towards Best Ethics Practices At Security And Privacy Conferences
Florian Hantke, Rafael Mrowczynski, Til Dralle, Ben Stock
摘要
Research ethics is a controversial and emotionally charged topic in the security and privacy community, sparking discussions at conferences and on social media. In recent years, some of the leading conferences have introduced interventions such as mandatory ethics sections, with mixed reactions within the community. Program committee chairs and steering committees increasingly emphasize ethics, yet there is limited empirical validation on ethics procedures and interventions, as well as no explicitly communicated goals.
To support a shared understanding in our community and guide informed decisions at the conference level, we examined past ethics policies at the top-four conferences and conducted in-depth semistructured interviews with senior and junior (n=20) community members, including some (former) chairs of program and research ethics committees. In these, we explored reasons for and goals of ethics procedures and discussed existing ethics interventions as well as possible new approaches proposed by our team.
While the community appears to be evolving toward the identified goals, i.e., raising ethical awareness and preventing the publication of unethical work, we identified the lack of ethical education within the community itself as a major obstacle to further progress on this matter. Ethical education is often passed to the universities. Interviewees also mentioned challenges with the complexity of ethics policies and the lack of consistency across different conferences, as well as policies changing year-to-year. Several participants warned that over-regulation may lead to backlash, encouraging mere compliance, such as people turning to LLMs for ethics sections rather than undertaking in-depth consideration. In response, we suggest a coordinated, community-wide ethics steering effort and take a first step by introducing an open ethics wiki.
• Security and privacy → Human and societal aspects of security and privacy.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper4
- Committed to Trust: A Qualitative Study on Security & Trust in Open Source Software ProjectsDominik Wermke, Noah Wöhler, Jan H. Klemmer, Marcel Fourné 等S&P 2022 · 被引用 54 次
- Where Are the Red Lines? Towards Ethical Server-Side Scans in Security and Privacy ResearchFlorian Hantke, Sebastian Roth, Rafael Mrowczynski, Christine Utz 等S&P 2024 · 被引用 17 次
- Tales of Favicons and Caches: Persistent Tracking in Modern BrowsersKonstantinos Solomos, John Kristoff, Chris Kanich, Jason PolakisNDSS 2021
- Ethical Frameworks and Computer Security Trolley Problems: Foundations for ConversationsTadayoshi Kohno, Yasemin Acar, Wulf LohUSENIX Security 2023
相关 Paper
- Ethics in Computer Security Research: A Data-Driven Assessment of the Past, the Present, and the Possible FutureHarshini Sri Ramulu, Helen Schmitt, Bogdan Rerich, Rachel Gonzalez Rodriguez 等CCS 2025
- "Flawed, but like democracy we don't have a better system": The Experts' Insights on the Peer Review Process of Evaluating Security PapersAnanta Soneji, Faris Bugra Kokulu, Carlos E. Rubio-Medrano, Tiffany Bao 等S&P 2022 · 被引用 17 次
- Changes in Research Ethics, Openness, and Transparency in Empirical Studies between CHI 2017 and CHI 2022Kavous Salehzadeh Niksirat, Lahari Goswami, Pooja Rao S. B., James Tyler 等CHI 2023 · 被引用 43 次
- Transparency in Usable Privacy and Security Research: Scholars' Perspectives, Practices, and RecommendationsJan H. Klemmer, Juliane Schmüser, Byron M. Lowens, Fabian Fischer 等S&P 2025
- Accounting for Privacy Pluralism: Lessons and Strategies from Community-Based Privacy GroupsErica Shusas, Patrick Skeba, Eric P. S. Baumer, Andrea ForteCHI 2023 · 被引用 6 次
